2020
DOI: 10.3390/ma13122752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical Non-Enzymatic Detection of Glucose Based on 3D Electroformed Copper on Ni Foam Nanostructures

Abstract: Despite the fact that the electrochemical biosensors based on glucose oxidase represent the golden standard for the management of diabetes, the elaboration of nonenzymatic sensors became extensively studied as an out-of-the-box concept that aims to simplify the existing approach. An important point of view is represented by the low price of the sensing device that has positive effects for both end-users and healthcare systems. The enzyme-free sensors based on low-cost materials such as transition metals have s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually, the traditional electrochemical sensors use enzymes (for example, catalase and horseradish peroxidase) for H 2 O 2 detection based on the direct electron transfer between redox enzymes and electrodes. However, limited by the high price, easy to denaturation and deactivation, and the complicated production process of the enzyme, enzyme-based sensors cannot meet diversified needs in practical applications. , In comparison, enzyme-free sensors have the advantages of simple electrode preparation, stable use, and sensitive detection, so enzyme-free sensors have been widely concerned. , The electrode materials in enzyme-free sensors are generally precious metals, , transition metals, , carbon, , and conductive polymers. , Among them, transition metals are abundant, have a variety of valence states as well as high electrocatalytic activity, and are often chosen as electrode-modifying materials for enzyme-free sensors. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, the traditional electrochemical sensors use enzymes (for example, catalase and horseradish peroxidase) for H 2 O 2 detection based on the direct electron transfer between redox enzymes and electrodes. However, limited by the high price, easy to denaturation and deactivation, and the complicated production process of the enzyme, enzyme-based sensors cannot meet diversified needs in practical applications. , In comparison, enzyme-free sensors have the advantages of simple electrode preparation, stable use, and sensitive detection, so enzyme-free sensors have been widely concerned. , The electrode materials in enzyme-free sensors are generally precious metals, , transition metals, , carbon, , and conductive polymers. , Among them, transition metals are abundant, have a variety of valence states as well as high electrocatalytic activity, and are often chosen as electrode-modifying materials for enzyme-free sensors. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first approach is the regulation of the Cu nanostructure’s morphology by controlling the synthesis parameters and producing various nanostructures, such as nanoneedles, nanourchins, nanowires, and nanoplatelets . The second strategy is the integration of Cu nanostructures with two-dimensional (2D) materials (like graphene) and fabrication of nanocomplexes , or the combination with three-dimensional (3D) foamlike materials and development of micro/nanoporous composites. , Compared to the different regulated nanostructures, the latter have recently become attractive electrocatalysts due to their higher surface area and unique electrochemical properties. , Various micro/nanoporous films and composites have been used for electrochemical glucose detection, including CuO nanowires/3D Cu porous foam, 3D nanoporous Pt film, Au nanoporous film, CuO/Au nanoporous hybrid, Cu/Au nanoporous film, microporous metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), , and Au/cobalt oxide nanoporous layers . However, the construction of such micro/nanoporous materials is complex and expensive for designing a cost-effective glucose sensing platform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 The second strategy is the integration of Cu nanostructures with two-dimensional (2D) materials (like graphene) and fabrication of nanocomplexes 26,34 or the combination with three-dimensional (3D) foamlike materials and development of micro/nanoporous composites. 33,35 Compared to the different regulated nanostructures, the latter have recently become attractive electrocatalysts due to their higher surface area and unique electrochemical properties. 33,35−37 Various micro/nanoporous films and composites have been used for electrochemical glucose detection, including CuO nanowires/3D Cu porous foam, 33 3D nanoporous Pt film, 38 Au nanoporous film, 39 CuO/Au nanoporous hybrid, 40 Cu/Au nanoporous film, 37 microporous metal−organic frameworks (MOFs), 41,42 and Au/cobalt oxide nanoporous layers.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%