¿El diseño de sistemas de anclaje mini cabestrillo realmente importa? Una comparación biomecánica entre Mini Arc™y Ophira™

Background: The study is amined to correlate the voiding pattern after successful mini sling Ophira implantation with postoperative symptoms and satisfaction, in addition to identifying obstructions. Materials and methods: From 2012 to 2015 in a single institution, all consecutive patients who had stress urinary incontinence treated by using the mini sling Ophira had a pre- and 12 months postoperative urodynamic test. The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire – Urinary Incontinence – Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF) and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire – Overactive Bladder (ICIQ-OAB) translated into Portuguese, were given. Patients were objectively considered cured when presenting no urinary incontinence at the Valsalva test and subjectively cured when the ICIQ-UI-SF was zero. Results: Questionnaire scores were obtained from 29 patients and urodynamic data from 20 patients. Mini sling Ophira implantation resulted in a significant improvement of urinary symptoms evidenced by a significant mean reduction in ICIQ-UI-SF from 16 to 5 ( p < 0.0001) and ICIQ-OAB from 8 to 4 ( p = 0.0001). The subjective and objective cure rates were 55% and 45%, respectively. The urodynamic changes were not related to success even when adjusted for age, hormonal status, or anterior pelvic organ prolapse. The mean maximum flow decreased to 4.9 mL/s (95% CI: 0.62–10.8; p = 0.035), and the mean detrusor pressure at maximum flow increased to 11.4 cmH 2 O (95% CI: 4–18; p = 0.0078). Conclusions: Mini sling Ophira implantation decreased maximum urinary flow and increased the detrusor pressure at the maximum urinary flow and these urodynamic changes were not related to success.

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

¿El diseño de sistemas de anclaje mini cabestrillo realmente importa? Una comparación biomecánica entre Mini Arc™y Ophira™

Cited by 3 publications

References 14 publications

A randomized prospective comparison of the needleless mini-sling “hammock” and “U-shape” configurations for management of stress urinary incontinence: 18 month follow-up results

A randomized prospective comparison of the needleless mini-sling “hammock” and “U-shape” configurations for management of stress urinary incontinence: 18 month follow-up results

Mini-bandelette sous-urétrale versus bandelette transobturatrice : efficacité et morbidité

Preliminary report of post-Ophira mini sling implantation voiding pattern: What to learn from pressure-flow studies?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About