A randomized prospective comparison of the needleless mini-sling “hammock” and “U-shape” configurations for management of stress urinary incontinence: 18 month follow-up results

Abstract

U-shape placement of needleless single-incision mini-sling mimicking the retropubic route did not satisfy in achieving the patient's goal when compared to hammock-shape placement.

The International Urogynecological Association/International Continence Society classification of complications of prosthesis and graft insertion: Pros and cons and a review of the literature

“…designated for bowel complications, did not cover defecatory dysfunction. Although that proposal would probably increase the complexity of the classification system, we believe that Tunitsky et al (2) might have a point, particularly in pelvic organ prolapse surgeries, but not necessarily in anti-incontinence procedures (10,11). We were able to explain all complications using the CTS system after insertion of old-and new-generation mid-urethral slings to treat USI.…”