2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2019.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicine for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although PCI is highly advantageous for patients with CHD, PPCP remains a main challenge. Chinese herbs have shown their signi cant therapeutic effects for patients with CHD and depression [24,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although PCI is highly advantageous for patients with CHD, PPCP remains a main challenge. Chinese herbs have shown their signi cant therapeutic effects for patients with CHD and depression [24,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, almost all meta-analyses reported the low quality of the included RCTs, identifying problems in randomization, concealment of allocation, blinding, dropouts, heterogeneity, and sample size. From the above, the meta-analysis conducted by Wang et al 2019included RCTs whose methodological quality was classified as moderate, providing evidence to a certain extent for Chinese herbal medicine's routine use for depression [42]. In addition, in the study conducted by Shi et al (2019), despite the clinical heterogeneity, the authors found that when comparing Chinese herbal medicine with a placebo, the overall quality of evidence according to the primary outcome measures was moderate or high, and the overall quality of evidence in Chinese herbal medicine relative to Western medicine was low or moderate.…”
Section: Chinese Herbal Medicine Tendencies In Research and Clinical mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diversity of pathologies covered by the remaining articles is considerable, with three articles related to cancer (involving 54, 14 and 18 RCTs)[33][34][35], three related to hypertension (involving 30, 17 and 39 RCTs)[36][37][38], three related to COVID-19 (involving 19, 7 and 18 RCTs)[39][40][41], two related to depression (involving 40 and 16 RCTs)[42,43], two related to headache (involving 31 and 30 RCTs)[44,45], and the others related to allergic rhinitis (involving 17 RCTs)[46], spinal cord injury (involving 26 RCTs)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, Chinese researchers are making a growing contribution to the neuroscience community. A number of reviews and commentaries have described achievements and challenges in mental health in China from different perspectives (Liu et al, 2011 ; Que, Lu, & Shi, 2019 ; Shi, 2019 ; Wang et al, 2019 a , b , c , d ). Yet, this review aims to provide an overall depiction of psychiatric research and healthcare system in China in the last three decades.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%