2021
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the sexual and mental health of adolescent and adult men who have sex with men and transgender women participating in two PrEP cohort studies in Brazil: COBra study protocol

Abstract: IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic and its control measures have impacted health and healthcare provision in various levels. Physical distancing measures, for instance, may affect sexual health, impacting access to HIV prevention supplies and changing sexual behaviour, as well as mental health, increasing feelings of unsafety and weakening community support ties. These effects can be worsened among socially marginalised groups, such as men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TGW). Brazil is among… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Analisando o grupo LGBTQIA+ de forma geral, percebeu-se, com o isolamento social imposto pela pandemia, um aumento do preconceito vivenciado pela comunidade, especificamente a propensão a conflitos familiares que podem levar a diversos tipos de violência, além do abuso de drogas. Nesse contexto, o aumento do estresse devido ao isolamento social com a família foi apontado por diversos estudos, principalmente os que analisaram jovens gays e transexuais (Cerqueira-Santos, et al, 2021;Bordiano, et al, 2021;Suen, et al, 2020;Ferraz, et al, 2021;Kauss, et al, 2021;Septarini, et al, 2021). A vulnerabilidade das pessoas LGBTQIA+ frente à pandemia foi percebida em estudos nos quais os resultados apontaram para uma diminuição da conexão com a comunidade (Suen, et al, 2020;Ruprecht, et al, 2021;Kamal, et al, 2021;.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Analisando o grupo LGBTQIA+ de forma geral, percebeu-se, com o isolamento social imposto pela pandemia, um aumento do preconceito vivenciado pela comunidade, especificamente a propensão a conflitos familiares que podem levar a diversos tipos de violência, além do abuso de drogas. Nesse contexto, o aumento do estresse devido ao isolamento social com a família foi apontado por diversos estudos, principalmente os que analisaram jovens gays e transexuais (Cerqueira-Santos, et al, 2021;Bordiano, et al, 2021;Suen, et al, 2020;Ferraz, et al, 2021;Kauss, et al, 2021;Septarini, et al, 2021). A vulnerabilidade das pessoas LGBTQIA+ frente à pandemia foi percebida em estudos nos quais os resultados apontaram para uma diminuição da conexão com a comunidade (Suen, et al, 2020;Ruprecht, et al, 2021;Kamal, et al, 2021;.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…26,27 The impact of the pandemic on sexual health among AYA specifically is less clear, but emerging data suggests the negative impacts on AYA are greater than older groups. 28,29 More research is needed in this population, as well as innovative interventions to address increases in condomless sex and multiple partners in the context of the pandemic, where virtual outreach will likely play a larger role than pre-pandemic. [30][31][32][33][34] The limitations of this study are important to note.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a cross-sectional design conducted before COVID-19 vaccination was available, and used data from the ANRS-COBra Study, a mixed-method study [ 16 ] nested in PrEP1519, an ongoing demonstration study of the effectiveness of PrEP conducted in three Brazilian cities – Salvador, Belo Horizonte, and São Paulo – from 2019 to 2021. Inclusion criteria in the cohort were AMSM and ATGW aged 15–19 years at enrollment, who had at least one sexual intercourse with another cisgender man or transgender woman and reported spending most of their time in the cities where the study takes place (i.e., living, studying, working, or residing in one of the study sites).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%