1988
DOI: 10.13031/2013.30727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Frost Action on Soil Aggregate Stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
29
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 also show that aggregate stability changed little from two to four FTCs, regardless of depth. With more FTCs, aggregate stability would almost surely decrease (Benoit 1973;Mostaghimi et al 1988) as the fitted curves in Fig. 2 suggest.…”
Section: Interaction Between Sampling Depthsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…2 also show that aggregate stability changed little from two to four FTCs, regardless of depth. With more FTCs, aggregate stability would almost surely decrease (Benoit 1973;Mostaghimi et al 1988) as the fitted curves in Fig. 2 suggest.…”
Section: Interaction Between Sampling Depthsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Only the Barnes soil decreased in stability from two to four FTCs (though again significant only at P = 0.453). Mostaghimi et al (1988), who wet sieved air-dried aggregates, found that Barnes aggregate stability decreased sharply from three to six FTCs.…”
Section: Interaction Between Soils and Freeze-thaw Cyclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As this water flows, it could transport via mass flow, slightly soluble bonding agents such as silica or Ca to soil particleto-particle contact points, there to be precipitated (Lehrsch et al, 1992;Perfect et al, 1990c). As an ice lens enlarges it imposes forces on nearby constrained aggregates, often weakening them, though at times strengthening them (Bullock et al, 1988;Lehrsch et al, 1991;Mostaghimi et al, 1988;Perfect et al, 1990c). An improved understanding of these forces and their modes of operation may permit us to minimize their adverse impacts on soil structure as well as maximize their beneficial impacts on soil structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%