1996
DOI: 10.1063/1.361244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of substrate orientation and crystal anisotropy on the thermally oxidized SiO2/SiC interface

Abstract: We use the high–low capacitance–voltage technique and the conductance–frequency techniques to characterize the SiO2/SiC interface formed by thermal oxidation of the silicon-face (0001) c-axis, the (112̄0) a-axis, and the (11̄00) a-axis orientations of 6H–SiC. The oxidation rate of the a-axis orientations is 3–5 times higher than that of the silicon face. Interface state densities on the a-axis orientations are a factor of 4–10 times higher than the Si-face c-axis orientation for both n-type and p-type dopings.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is demonstrated that D it of MOS capacitors grown on Si(0001)-or a-plane (1120) /(1 100)-faces is lower than grown on C (000 1)-faces [10,16,17]. Faces, which are tilted by a certain angle with respect to the c-axis, provide different D it -values [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is demonstrated that D it of MOS capacitors grown on Si(0001)-or a-plane (1120) /(1 100)-faces is lower than grown on C (000 1)-faces [10,16,17]. Faces, which are tilted by a certain angle with respect to the c-axis, provide different D it -values [18].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The oxidation rate of 4H-SiC depends upon the orientation of 4H-SiC wafers. This has been determined experimentally by Shenoy et al [25]. The oxidation rate for C-face is three to five times faster than for the Si-face.…”
Section: Oxidationmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…20 However, the carbon itself is unlikely to cause the oxide degradation: the oxides thermally grown on silicon carbide show good insulating properties despite a permanent carbon supply from the substrate. [21][22][23] Apparently then, the conducting defects in the SIMOX BOX are mainly related to the clusters of excess silicon. Indeed, etch-back experiments reveal the presence of defects protruding all the way through the BOX layer into the superficial silicon, 24 indicating a laterally inhomogeneous phase separation in the BOX.…”
Section: Defects In the Buried Sio 2 Of Simox Structures: An Overmentioning
confidence: 99%