1973
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.2210160231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of heterostructure on the hole diffusion length of epitaxial GaAs

Abstract: By measuring the short‐circuit photocurrent in a Schottky barrier diode the minority carrier hole diffusion length in undoped epitaxial layers has been determined of GaAs grown on substrates of GaAs and GaP, and in similar structures with a layer of GaxAl1–xAs between the substrate and the epitaxial GaAs layer. In the heteroepitaxial layers grown directly on GaP the hole diffusion length is less than 0.1 μm. This is considerably smaller than the diffusion length in the homoepitaxial layers, which is between 0.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1988
1988

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The alternative method of measuring J , against W was used by Young and Rowland (1973) to study epitaxial n-type GaAs grown on GaP substrates with and without an intermediate GaAlAs layer and by Smith and Abbott (1972) on both n-and p-type Gap. However, Smith and Rbbott obtained values of I; considerably shorter than those obtained by Dapkus et al(1973) from SEM measurements (see below) and a careful comparison of the two photodiode methods (also on Gap) by Young and Wight (1974) showed that the J , against W method does, indeed, give values of L which are too short.…”
Section: Junction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alternative method of measuring J , against W was used by Young and Rowland (1973) to study epitaxial n-type GaAs grown on GaP substrates with and without an intermediate GaAlAs layer and by Smith and Abbott (1972) on both n-and p-type Gap. However, Smith and Rbbott obtained values of I; considerably shorter than those obtained by Dapkus et al(1973) from SEM measurements (see below) and a careful comparison of the two photodiode methods (also on Gap) by Young and Wight (1974) showed that the J , against W method does, indeed, give values of L which are too short.…”
Section: Junction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%