2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scispo.2019.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of during of tapering on anaerobic power and capacity in road cyclists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our approach, neither peak power during 6-s sprint nor V max changed differently between groups but V max was improved in CON only. This is in contrast to previous findings where improved peak power output (Fortes et al, 2019) and muscle strength (Martin et al, 1994) were found from short periods (2-4 weeks) of reduced training volume and maintained intensity-distribution in well-trained cyclists and runners. Inactivity has previously been reported to change fiber-type distribution toward type IIX phenotype (Coyle et al, 1985;Andersen and Aagaard, 2000).…”
Section: Sprint Performancecontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our approach, neither peak power during 6-s sprint nor V max changed differently between groups but V max was improved in CON only. This is in contrast to previous findings where improved peak power output (Fortes et al, 2019) and muscle strength (Martin et al, 1994) were found from short periods (2-4 weeks) of reduced training volume and maintained intensity-distribution in well-trained cyclists and runners. Inactivity has previously been reported to change fiber-type distribution toward type IIX phenotype (Coyle et al, 1985;Andersen and Aagaard, 2000).…”
Section: Sprint Performancecontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a study on amateur road cyclists performing sprint training (Fortes et al, 2019), power calculations were made to determine the minimum of participants to include in the present study to detect changes in sprint performance. Based on the estimated effect size (ES) of 0.60 in changes in sprint performance when reducing training load for 3 weeks (Fortes et al, 2019) together with an alpha-level of 0.05, a power of 0.80, and a correlation between repeated measures of 0.50, the minimum sample size needed to determine significant differences in sprint performance was calculated to be eight in each group. A mixed linear model was applied to compare relative changes between groups in physiological, performance, and strength measures with group (and sprint) defined as fixed effects and corrected using Pre-values as a covariate using the software SPSS v.25.…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Skorski et al [ 83 ], in addition to and EM, anaerobic power and capacity are important factors that determine performance in road cycling. This is because in many road cycling races, first place can be decided in the final sprint, and cyclists with high anaerobic capacity and power can achieve better results [ 31 , 84 ]. Therefore, it may be important to determine the appropriate reduction time to optimize the power and anaerobic capacity of cyclists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the differences sport-to-sport and athlete-to-athlete, these findings might not accurately reflect the characteristics of tapering for endurance sports. Although the application effects of tapering in endurance events have received much attention in the last decade [ 13 , 22 , 28 31 ], it is very difficult for athletes, coaches, and researchers to find tapering strategies to increase performance in endurance athletes. The previous systematic reviews have helped to shed light on the effects of tapering strategies on competitive performance [ 30 , 32 ], and on nutrition, hydration, and recovery strategies during pre-competition taper [ 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improvement in VO 2max for ET and BET groups after the 12-week corroborates previous studies that found changes in VO 2máx after whole-body endurance training. 39,40 The VO 2max may be improved by adopting a F I G U R E 5 Internal training load and mental demand according to group (CT, ET, and BET) and time (weeks). a.u., arbitrary units; BET, brain endurance training; CT, cognitive training; ET, endurance training; *p < 0.05 a main time effect; # p < 0.05 a significant difference of ET group and BET group for CT Group; $ p < 0.05 a significant difference between ET group and CET group.…”
Section: Endurance Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%