Proceedings of the IEEE 2005 International Interconnect Technology Conference, 2005.
DOI: 10.1109/iitc.2005.1499944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of CoWP cap thickness on via yield and reliability for Cu interconnects with CoWP-only cap process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the current depended on temperature, and J=E was proportional to ffiffiffi ffi E p , the conduction mechanism was considered to be PF emission through trap states such as diffused Cu ions. 31) However, the leakage current did not depend on the temperature at the times close to the breakdown, as observed in Figs. 11(a) and 11(b), which present Fowler-Nordheim (FN) plots of the leakage current at the times close to the breakdown for n-Si and p-Si, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison Of Tddb Characteristics Between N-si and P-simentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the current depended on temperature, and J=E was proportional to ffiffiffi ffi E p , the conduction mechanism was considered to be PF emission through trap states such as diffused Cu ions. 31) However, the leakage current did not depend on the temperature at the times close to the breakdown, as observed in Figs. 11(a) and 11(b), which present Fowler-Nordheim (FN) plots of the leakage current at the times close to the breakdown for n-Si and p-Si, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison Of Tddb Characteristics Between N-si and P-simentioning
confidence: 64%
“…23) In our CoWP barriers, there was no thickness dependence of the barrier properties, which indicates that our CoWP has no barrier properties against Cu diffusion even though other studies have reported that CoWP has barrier properties against Cu diffusion. 20,[29][30][31][32] The reason for this difference is considered to be due to the compositional difference and the crystallization between our CoWP and those samples used in the other studies. The surface roughnesses of the 10 and 40 nm CoWP=NiB films were 2.23 and 2.67 nm, respectively, as determined by AFM measurements, and the roughness values were less than the total thickness; therefore, the film coverage should not be the reason.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The film composition determined by XPS was as follows: Co, 97%; W, 1%; and P, 2%. In previous research on electroless plated CoWP as a metal cap, the composition were as follows: Co, 91%; W, 3%; and P, 6% for one sample [24][25][26] and Co, 89.4%; W, 2.4%; and P, 8.2% for another sample. 27) It was reported that there were barrier properties of CoWP in 400 14) or 500 C 27) annealing.…”
Section: Tddb Characteristics Of Ebls and Osmlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CoWP having the resistance of Cu diffusion was formed with the electroless deposition in the upper part of the trench in order to eliminate the passivation layer arranged on the trench wiring. 5,6 SiOC having a dielectric constant lower than SiO 2 was used as a chemical mechanical polishing ͑CMP͒ cap to decrease k eff between interconnects. 7,8 The CMP-cap film was used as a sacrificial film and thinned by polishing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%