Efeitos combinados dos movimentos de moradia sobre os programas habitacionais autogestionários

Abstract

Resumo O artigo discute os efeitos políticos dos movimentos sociais sobre a política pública, a partir do caso da União Nacional por Moradia Popular (UNMP). Para essa análise, mobilizamos a literatura anglo-saxônica que tem se dedicado ao estudo dos resultados dos movimentos, com ênfase sobre o modelo dos efeitos combinados (joint-effect model). A UNMP tem impactado a política pública no que concerne aos programas habitacionais autogestionários, a partir de uma combinação entre capacidade de mobilização e a presença de aliados em posições institucionais de poder. Na compreensão sobre como essas variáveis se combinam na produção resultados, destacamos dois fatores explicativos: o compartilhamento de projetos e a múltipla filiação.

The limits of participatory democracy and the inclusion of social movements in local government

“…The housing movement in Brazil is quite diverse, composed of a set of organizations linked to policies, organisations, domains and repertoires, and its origins are possibly connected to the processes of urbanization, industrialization and exploitation of the working class (Kowarick, 2009;Tatagiba & Teixeira, 2016). Within this diverse group, we find several types of housing movements, organised at the national and local level, which despite their particularities, are guided by the enforceability of the right to housing.…”

Political consequences of socio-territorial conflicts. Conceptualizing changing paths of citizenship and democratic governance in the Andean Region of Latin America

“…Another process that has been observed is the combination of mobilized resources and political opportunities (Tatagiba and Teixeira 2016). The literature provides several useful distinctions to understand cumulative and combined effects, among them, the phases of public policy, the role of networks with participation of institutional agents and/or political actors, and the intervention of the international variable in the decisions.…”

“…The literature provides several useful distinctions to understand cumulative and combined effects, among them, the phases of public policy, the role of networks with participation of institutional agents and/or political actors, and the intervention of the international variable in the decisions. A simple model of combined effects somewhat schematically suggests two hypotheses that influence the impact on public policies, the first one, related to the presence of powerful allies and the other, to the nature of the claims (Giugni 1998, cited by Tatagiba and Teixeira 2016). The larger the number and variety of powerful allies in public opinion or the political system, the greater the chance to exert influence.…”

Participatory mechanisms and inequality reduction: searching for plausible relations

“…These different pictures emerge as one makes use of different analytical lenses. The first draws on the perspective of political mobilization (Carter, 2009;Dowbor, 2009;Tatagiba & Teixeira, 2016). The second makes use of criteria that, according to the literature, should be fulfilled to ensure the quality of public participation processes (and public deliberation processes, in particular).…”