Economic Shocks and Crime: Evidence from the Brazilian Trade Liberalization

Abstract

This paper studies the effect of changes in economic conditions on crime. We exploit the 1990s trade liberalization in Brazil as a natural experiment generating exogenous shocks to local economies. We document that regions exposed to larger tariff reductions experienced a temporary increase in crime following liberalization. Next, we investigate through what channels the tradeinduced economic shocks may have affected crime. We show that the shocks had significant effects on potential determinants of crime, such as labor market conditions, public goods provision, and income inequality. We propose a novel framework exploiting the distinct dynamic responses of these variables to obtain bounds on the effect of labor market conditions on crime. Our results indicate that this channel accounts for 75 to 93 percent of the effect of the trade-induced shocks on crime. JEL Classification Codes: J6, K42, F16 AbstractThis paper studies the eect of changes in economic conditions on crime. We exploit the 1990s trade liberalization in Brazil as a natural experiment generating exogenous shocks to local economies. We document that regions exposed to larger tari reductions experienced a temporary increase in crime following liberalization. Next, we investigate through what channels the trade-induced economic shocks may have aected crime. We show that the shocks had signicant eects on potential determinants of crime, such as labor market conditions, public goods provision, and income inequality. We propose a novel framework exploiting the distinct dynamic responses of these variables to obtain bounds on the eect of labor market conditions on crime. Our results indicate that this channel accounts for 75 to 93 percent of the eect of the trade-induced shocks on crime.JEL Classication: J6, K42, F16

The effects of import competition on health in the local economy

“…Feler and Senses () show that import competition depresses spending on public welfare and housing. They further find that import competition increases local crime rates, consistent with related evidence for the United States (Beach & Lopresti, ), India (Iyer & Topalova, ), and Brazil (Dix‐Carneiro, Soares, & Ulyssea, ).…”

Trade Liberalization and Mortality: Evidence from U.S. Counties

“…The sample period is 1990 to 2013. 24 The left-hand side variable represents an outcome in county c, for example the age-adjusted death rate for a particular cause of death and demographic group in year t. The rst term on the right-hand side is the DID term of interest, an interaction of a post-PNTR (i.e., t > 2000) indicator with the (time-invariant) county-level NTR Gap. X ct represents the two additional, timevarying controls for policy discussed in Section 2.3: the overall U.S. import tari rate associated with the sectors produced by the county (N T R ct ) and the sensitivity of the county to the phasing out of the global Multi-Fiber Arrangement (M F A Exposure ct ).…”

Assessing concerns for the economic consequence of the COVID-19 response and mental health problems associated with economic vulnerability and negative economic shock in Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom

“…Second, there are concerns related to the negative consequences of income shocks; for instance, data from applications for unemployment insurance have increased exponentially in the US (reaching 33m according to the Department of Labor, and likely underestimated, [ 20 ]). We know from studies on scarcity that this may cause long-term problems in terms of cognitive resources and behavioural change [ 21 ], and may weaken social cohesion and increase the crime rate once society is out of lockdown and functioning normally again [ 22 , 23 ]. Third, there is a fundamental argument that the current measures are driven by the precautionary principle and not by cost-benefit analysis.…”