2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose assessment in dental cone-beam computed tomography: Comparison of optically stimulated luminescence dosimetry with Monte Carlo method

Abstract: The variety of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) machines and their applications has rapidly increased in recent years, making the dose evaluation of individual devices an important issue. Patient doses from CBCT were assessed with two different methods: optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter (OSLD) measurements and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, in four different examination modes. Based on an analysis of the measurement process and the obtained values, a recommendation is made regarding which method i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In literature, only few studies have examined side differences in dentomaxillofacial imaging, especially for the parotid and lens region, describing that the size and position of the FOV and the rotation arc may lead to dose asymmetry [ 7 ]. There are studies in which dose measurements were performed on both sides of paired organs, but side differences have not been discussed [ 14 ]. Especially in dentistry, where CBCT is a rising frequently used imaging method, our results according side differences may improve the diagnostic work-up in clinical and practice settings in order to lower the radiation exposure [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature, only few studies have examined side differences in dentomaxillofacial imaging, especially for the parotid and lens region, describing that the size and position of the FOV and the rotation arc may lead to dose asymmetry [ 7 ]. There are studies in which dose measurements were performed on both sides of paired organs, but side differences have not been discussed [ 14 ]. Especially in dentistry, where CBCT is a rising frequently used imaging method, our results according side differences may improve the diagnostic work-up in clinical and practice settings in order to lower the radiation exposure [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the effective doses of scanned organs could be calculated precisely. The considerable advantages such as reducing the uncertainties caused by type, location, and the limited number of the dosimeters, make the MC simulation to be a very useful tool in radiation dose calculation [13,15,16].…”
Section: Jinst 16 P10011mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the effective dose measurement which is calculated using absorbed dose can be performed using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) or optically stimulated luminescent (OSL) dosimeters in physical anthropomorphic phantoms [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Nowadays, The SEDENTEXCT guidelines strongly recommend the use of the Monte Carlo (MC) simulation in virtual phantoms for the evaluation of the effective doses in CBCT examinations [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is widely used in the dental field for purposes ranging from disease diagnosis to preoperative simulation and surgical guide construction [ 1 , 2 ]. CBCT can provide three-dimensional (3D) images of the targeted area with the advantage of lower dosage than multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) [ 3 , 4 ]. However, in CBCT, due to the cone-shaped geometry of the X-ray source and the absence of post-patient collimation, more scattering rays deteriorate the image quality than is the case with MDCT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%