2021
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/16/10/p10011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Patient-specific dose assessment using CBCT images and Monte Carlo calculations

Abstract: Today, the use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) is increasing rapidly in medical diagnosis, therefore evaluation of patient's dose is a very important issue in radiation protection of patients. This study aimed to evaluate the patient-specific dose using CBCT images. Since CBCT images only showed a part of the head and while, the total anatomical specification of the head should be defined for dose assessment, therefore the whole parts of the head were generated using the data of the Exten… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So many attempts have been made with actual methods to determine just how much more extra exposure is the patient receiving from the cbct examination right before the radiation treatment. Most of these methods are using thermoluminescent (TLD) or mosfet dosimeters [13] but in recent years such calculations are performed via monte carlo especially in patient-specific dose calculations [14] and slowly opening the way to Monte Carlo simulation in clinical use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So many attempts have been made with actual methods to determine just how much more extra exposure is the patient receiving from the cbct examination right before the radiation treatment. Most of these methods are using thermoluminescent (TLD) or mosfet dosimeters [13] but in recent years such calculations are performed via monte carlo especially in patient-specific dose calculations [14] and slowly opening the way to Monte Carlo simulation in clinical use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%