Divergent Principles of Politeness in Verbal and Non-Verbal Directive Speech Act

Abstract

This study was conducted aiming at examining: (1) the divergent principles of politeness in students' directive speech act (2) factors affecting politeness and impoliteness in verbal and non-verbal directive speech act produced by students at grade X in Senior High School 1 Mataram in the learning process. The subject of this study are teachers teaching Bahasa Indonesia, English, Economy, History, Math, Religion, Civic, and Science, and all students at Grade X of Science 1, Science 3 and Social 2 in Senior High School 1 Mataram. This study is a descriptive qualitative research. The data source in this study is the number of utterances produced by students and teachers in the learning process. The data were collected through observation. This study revealed that: (1) there were divergent principles of politeness in participants' directive speech act namely single and multiple divergent principles of politeness affected by speaker intentionally accused addressees, intentionally uttered by neglecting the context, was protective to other arguments, showed emotional feeling, given critiques in impolite words and mocked at other; and (2) there were factors affecting politeness and impoliteness in verbal and nonverbal directive speech act produced by students in learning process namely linguistic factor and non-linguistic factor.

Fundamentalist and tolerant islamic discourse in john updike’s terrorist and jonathan wright’s translation the televangelist: a corpus-based critical discourse analysis of semantic prosody

“…Freake et al, 2011;Jaworska & Krishnamurthy, 2012), examining key function/grammatical words (e.g. Pearce, 2014), and using other analytical models and/or theories; for example, functional theory (El-Falaky, 2015;Lee, 2016;Lindayana et al, 2018), translation theory (Murphy, 2013), social theory (Mulderrig, 2008;, critical stylistics (Jeffries & Evans, 2013), contrastive analysis (Schroter & Storjohann, 2015), sociolinguistics (Chiluwa, 2012), critical literacy pedagogy (Abid & Manan, 2015), multimodality (Edwards & Milani, 2014), topic modeling (Tornberg & Tornberg, 2016;Iswanto et al, 2018;Jurgaitis, 2018), pragmatics (Triebl, 2015), genre theory (Skalicky, 2013), theory of governmentality (MacDonald & Hunter, 2013) and theory of argumentation (Lippi & Torroni, 2016;Azhari et al, 2018). Nevertheless, as note, "It seems ... that the main aim of many studies in combining corpus methods and CDA is to arrive at more accurate, insightful, objective, and generalizable findings rather than contributing to a specific discourse-oriented theory" (11).…”

Implikatur Ungkapan Bahasa Daerah Dalam Gugatan Penghinaan Dan Pencemaran Nama Baik Di Ntt: Sebuah Studi Kasus Linguistik Forensik

“…Pengungkapan implikatur tidak bisa hanya menggunakan fitur-fitur semantis, perlu sebuah pengetahuan bersama dalam mengungkap implikatur secara utuh (Olshtain & Cohen, 1990). Dalam lingkup linguistik forensik, implikatur memiliki fungsi khusus, yaitu untuk memperhitungkan apa yang diartikan atau apa yang dimaksudkan oleh penutur secara berbeda dari apa yang dinyatakan secara harfiah lewat tuturan (Lindayana et al, 2018).…”

Politeness Maxims by the Students of Mechanical Engineering State Polytechnic of Bali

“…University as a formal institution in which between the students should use polite conversation in their interaction, usually use impolite language in some situation especially when students talk to their close friends. This situation is not really important because we talk with our close friend; however we need to keep others feeling due to language plays a fundamental role in establishing harmonious relationship between people [5]. Thus this is an ideal strategy to use when the speaker wants to avoid responsibility for doing a Face Threatening Act [6].…”