2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distortion effects of emissions trading system on intra-sector competition and carbon leakage: A case study of China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find that the main reason why trade contributes to the destruction of environmental resources is that the cost of environmental resources is not reflected in the market price. Our conclusion is consistent with the literature regarding pollution haven (Ji [25]) and carbon leakage (Zhang et al [26]). Compared to Ji [25] and Zhang et al [26], we all conclude that unintended transfer payment causes competition distortion which leads to environmental pollution and carbon leakage.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We find that the main reason why trade contributes to the destruction of environmental resources is that the cost of environmental resources is not reflected in the market price. Our conclusion is consistent with the literature regarding pollution haven (Ji [25]) and carbon leakage (Zhang et al [26]). Compared to Ji [25] and Zhang et al [26], we all conclude that unintended transfer payment causes competition distortion which leads to environmental pollution and carbon leakage.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Our conclusion is consistent with the literature regarding pollution haven (Ji [25]) and carbon leakage (Zhang et al [26]). Compared to Ji [25] and Zhang et al [26], we all conclude that unintended transfer payment causes competition distortion which leads to environmental pollution and carbon leakage. The cost of exploitation of natural resources and environmental damage is not adequately reflected in market prices of goods or services; is one of the main reasons trade contributes to the destruction of environmental resources.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Implicationssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Meanwhile, for farmers, the income will be lower because the selling price received is much lower. The amount of the trading margin is determined by the size of the costs incurred and the risk borne by the trading system (Zhang, et. al., 2020).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…China's ambitious dual carbon targets mirror its dedication to active participation in global climate governance [22]. Central to this mission is the assessment of the role of China's forest carbon sinks within its carbon emission trading market, with a particular emphasis on the broader issue of carbon leakage and its worldwide impact [23]. This assessment is pivotal in refining China's forest carbon policies and in reinforcing its strategic role in global climate discussions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%