2007
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2007.907989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directional Sensitivity of Single Event Upsets in 90 nm CMOS Due to Charge Sharing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total area of one Double-DICE latch is compared to the area of two DICE latches with the sensitive node separations of 8.5 µm and 5µm (minimum suggested distance between sensitive nodes [8]) in Table 1. Table 1 shows that the Double-DICE latch has 33.33 % less area compared to a pair of DICE latches with a sensitive nodal distance of 8.5 µm; the area saving drops to 8 % when a sensitive nodal separation of 5 µm is used.…”
Section: Implementation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The total area of one Double-DICE latch is compared to the area of two DICE latches with the sensitive node separations of 8.5 µm and 5µm (minimum suggested distance between sensitive nodes [8]) in Table 1. Table 1 shows that the Double-DICE latch has 33.33 % less area compared to a pair of DICE latches with a sensitive nodal distance of 8.5 µm; the area saving drops to 8 % when a sensitive nodal separation of 5 µm is used.…”
Section: Implementation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have shown that bipolar amplification between PMOS devices due to the n-well potential collapse and charge diffusion between NMOS devices in the case of a single strike are the main charge sharing mechanisms [7]. Through 3-D Technology ComputerAided Design (TCAD) simulations, Amusan et al, showed that the n-well potential collapse from an angular strike with a Linear Energy Transfer (LET) of 21 MeV.cm 2 /mg can extend as far as 5 µm from the strike location for a 90 nm technology [8]. Therefore, any hardened design with sensitive PMOS pairs located within this distance are susceptible to parasitic bipolar effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In common CMOS process, the radiation hardened by design (RHBD) layout methods have been proposed to enhance the SET tolerance [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Charge sharing techniques and SETs model are used to mitigate SET effects [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After several decades, the mechanisms of SET have already been explored in common bulk CMOS technologies and the charge collection is controlled by drift, diffusion and bipolar effect [2,3,4]. The previous investigations indicated that the bipolar effect is the main mechanism in PMOSFET [5]. The research also showed that most of the SET comes from the ion striking PMOSFETs but not NMOSFETs due to the significant bipolar effect [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So SET mitigation in PMOSFET becomes a more important issue. In order to reduce the threat of SET in IC in bulk CMOS process, several efficient radiation hardened by design (RHBD) layout techniques are proposed for SET mitigation [5,7,8,9,10,11]. However, none of these RHBD techniques can significantly reduce SET pulse width.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%