2021
DOI: 10.5380/riep.v25i3.67438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory 2: antecedents, development, and future improvements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory 2 (IDCP‐2; de Carvalho & Pianowski, 2021) is a self‐report scale to evaluate pathological personality traits. This scale comprises 206 items, 47 factors, and 12 dimensions: dependency, aggressiveness, mood instability, eccentricity, attention‐seeking, distrust, grandiosity, isolation, criticism avoidance, self‐sacrifice, conscientiousness, and inconsequence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory 2 (IDCP‐2; de Carvalho & Pianowski, 2021) is a self‐report scale to evaluate pathological personality traits. This scale comprises 206 items, 47 factors, and 12 dimensions: dependency, aggressiveness, mood instability, eccentricity, attention‐seeking, distrust, grandiosity, isolation, criticism avoidance, self‐sacrifice, conscientiousness, and inconsequence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some of these instruments, such as the EPQ (90 items), have been studied in the Brazilian population, 7 the main psychometric properties of the EPQR-A (24 items) have not yet been evaluated. Moreover, other instruments for personality assessment that have been validated, such as the Personality Inventory for the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V) (PID-5) (220 items) 13 and the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory 2 (IDCP-2) (206 items), 14 are composed of many items, limiting their use in long research protocols. Even the other versions of Eysenck’s questionnaires are still lengthy, which may restrict their usage in studies and hinder data collection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%