1923
DOI: 10.1007/bf01961722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Die extragenitalen heterotopen Epithelwucherungen vom Bau der Uterusschleimhaut

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1927
1927
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other hypotheses are those of metaplastic processes, as coelomic metaplasia [9,[124][125][126], or metaplasia of the peritoneal or ovarian tissue [127,128], or metaplasia of the peritoneal serosa cuff initiated by inflammation [9,129] or by hormonal stimulation [130]. The possibility of metaplasia development, by differentiation of mesenchymal cells (omnipotent blastema) activated by substances released by degenerating endometrium eliminated into the abdominal cavity, has been also proposed [131,132].…”
Section: Short Overview -Historical Hallmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other hypotheses are those of metaplastic processes, as coelomic metaplasia [9,[124][125][126], or metaplasia of the peritoneal or ovarian tissue [127,128], or metaplasia of the peritoneal serosa cuff initiated by inflammation [9,129] or by hormonal stimulation [130]. The possibility of metaplasia development, by differentiation of mesenchymal cells (omnipotent blastema) activated by substances released by degenerating endometrium eliminated into the abdominal cavity, has been also proposed [131,132].…”
Section: Short Overview -Historical Hallmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endometriosis was supposed only to develop where peritoneum was found. According to this theory that was already suggested by Iwanoff (1898) and later was followed by Lauche (1923) and Meyer (1924), the histogenesis of endometriosis is explained by metaplasia of the original coelomic membrane. These metaplastic changes could occur secondary to inflammatory processes or hormonal influences (Meyer, 1919;Novak, 1931).…”
Section: In-situ Developmentmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The oldest concept, that of in-situ develop- Table I. Theories on the pathogenesis of endometriosis (modified from Hingst, 1926 andRidley, 1968) In-situ development a. Germinal epithelium of the ovary (Waldeyer, 1870) b. Embryonic cell rests Mesonephric (Wolffian knob, Wolffian duct) (Von Recklinghausen, 1895, Breus, 1894 Paramesonephric (Mullerian ducts) (Cullen, 1896, Russell, 1899 c. Coelomic metaplasia (Iwanoff, 1898, Meyer, 1903, Lauche, 1923 d. Metaplasia by inflammation (Hueter, 1918, Meyer, 1919, Tobler, 1923 e. Metaplasia by hormonal stimulation (Novak, 1931) f. Metaplasia by induction (omnipotent blastema) (Levander, 1941, Merril, 1966 g. Secondary Mullerian system (Lauchlan, 1972) Transplantation a. Implantation, retrograde menstruation (Sampson, 1921) b. Implantation, mechanical transplantation (Greenhill, 1942) c. Benign lymphogenous metastasis (hystero-adenosis metastatica) (Halban, 1924/1925, Javert, 1949 Combination of in-situ development and endometrial transplantation and implantation ment, is that endometriosis develops on the spot where it is found. Development may occur from the remnants of the Wolffian ducts or the Mullerian ducts, or alternatively from metaplasia of the peritoneal or ovarian tissue (Ridley, 1968;Lauchlan, 1972).…”
Section: Three Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation