2017
DOI: 10.1080/09540105.2017.1359498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a quantitative fluorescence-based lateral flow immunoassay for determination of chloramphenicol, thiamphenicol and florfenicol in milk

Abstract: A competitive lateral flow immunoassay (LFA) using fluorescent microspheres (FMs) as label was developed for the quantitative detection of chloramphenicol (CAP), thiamphenicol (TAP) and florfenicol (FF) in milk. The limit of detection (LOD) for CAP, TAP and FF in milk was 0.08, 0.8 and 1.9 μg L −1 , respectively. The recovery of intra and inter-assay ranged from 87.7% to 107.0% and 82.5% to 112.3%, with corresponding coefficient of variations less than 11.3% and 14.5%, respectively. The sensitivity of the FMs … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, various methods have been used to measure CAP, TAP, FF, and FFA in animal-derived foods; these methods include the fluorescent microsphere lateral flow immunoassay (FM-LFA), 7 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), 8,9 reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (RP-HPLC-UVD), 10 HPLC with diode array detection (DAD), 11 RP-HPLC with fluorescence detection (FLD), 12 LC-mass spectrometry (MS), 13,14 LC tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), [15][16][17][18][19][20] ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC)-MS/ MS, [21][22][23][24] and gas chromatography-negative chemical ionization mass spectrometry (GC-NCI/MS). 25 In previous research, we developed an LC-MS/MS 20 method for the simultaneous determination of CAP, TAP, FF, and FFA in eggs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, various methods have been used to measure CAP, TAP, FF, and FFA in animal-derived foods; these methods include the fluorescent microsphere lateral flow immunoassay (FM-LFA), 7 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), 8,9 reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (RP-HPLC-UVD), 10 HPLC with diode array detection (DAD), 11 RP-HPLC with fluorescence detection (FLD), 12 LC-mass spectrometry (MS), 13,14 LC tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), [15][16][17][18][19][20] ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC)-MS/ MS, [21][22][23][24] and gas chromatography-negative chemical ionization mass spectrometry (GC-NCI/MS). 25 In previous research, we developed an LC-MS/MS 20 method for the simultaneous determination of CAP, TAP, FF, and FFA in eggs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several studies devoted to multicomponent ICAs for simultaneous detection of antibiotics, either from a single pharmacological group [29][30][31][32][33] or from different classes [30][31][32] have been proposed ( Table 1). In general, multicomponent ICAs seem to be a promising technology for effective and low-cost point-of-care screening of food products for relevant contaminants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with UV and mass spectrometry detectors (Asea, Patterson, Korsrud, Dowling, & Boison, 2001;Jedziniak, Szprengier-Juszkiewicz, & Olejnik, 2009;Liu et al, 2015;Peng et al, 2013;van Pamel & Daeseleire, 2015). Although these methods are very accurate and sensitive, they are costly and require complex sample pretreatment steps and trained personnel (Mukunzi, Suryoprabowo, Song, Liu, & Kuang, 2018;Qu et al, 2019;Wang et al, 2018;Zeng, Jiang, Liu, Song, & Kuang, 2018). Immunoassays are superior to chromatographic methods in screening tests for their simplicity, sensitivity, and high-throughput capabilities (Chen et al, 2017; Kong et al, 2017;Wang, Luo, Chen, Huang, & Jiang, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%