Development and validation of the Intrinsic Religiousness Inventory (IRI)

Taunay, Tauily C.; Cristino, Eva Dias; Machado, Myrela O.; Rola, Francisco H.; Lima, José Wellington Oliveira; Macêdo, Danielle Silveira; Gondim, Francisco de Assis Aquino; Moreira‐Almeida, Alexander; Carvalho, André F.

doi:10.1016/s1516-4446(12)70014-4

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Participant religiosity was measured using the Duke University Religion Index (DUREL), a scale validated in multiple health studies and across cultures (Hafizi et al, 2013;Koenig & Büssing, 2010;Lucchetti et al, 2012;Saffari, Zeidi, Pakpour, & Koenig, 2013;Taunay, Gondim, et al, 2012). The DUREL has three subscales: organized religion (ORA; one item), nonorganized religion (NORA; one item), and intrinsic religiosity (IR; three items).…”

Section: Religiosity and Spiritualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Recently patient religious and/or spiritual (R&S) needs have been increasingly identified as essential components in the patient healthcare experience. Although R&S has been largely avoided in many patient interactions (Astrow, Puchalski, & Sulmasy, 2001; Koenig, 2012; Pargament, Koenig, Tarakeshwar, & Hahn, 2004; Peteet & Balboni, 2013), the American Medical Association (AMA) has recently highlighted the importance of R&S in clinical practice and PCC (Lucchetti et al, 2012; Taunay, Cristino, et al, 2012). Specifically, R&S may lead to better patient outcomes, assist in coping with diagnosis or prognosis, psychosocial adjustment, and making meaning of the illness experience, as well as increased feelings of overall well-being (Breitbart, 2002; Daaleman, Kuckelman Cobb, & Frey, 2001; Koenig, 2012; Savel & Munro, 2014).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A mixed-methods approach to understanding the role of religion and spirituality in healthcare provider well-being.

Kelly

Hyer

Payne

et al. 2020

Psychology of Religion and Spirituality

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of the current study was to define the religious and spiritual (R&S) beliefs of healthcare providers and examine how those beliefs translate into clinical practice. A mixed-methods approach was used to administer and analyze an online survey that included individual-level, occupational, and R&S demographic questions, The Duke University Religion Index, and open-ended questions about the use of R&S in clinical practice. Analyses included descriptive statistics (quantitative [QUAN]), content analysis (qualitative [QUAL]), and chi-square test of independence and Fisher's exact test (QUAN ϩ QUAL). The final analytic cohort was composed of 387 participants. Providers included primary care (26.9%), nurses (27.1%), allied health (23.5%), and mental health (22.5%) professionals. Most participants reported being religious and spiritual (42.9%), followed by only spiritual (36.6%) or neither (20.3%). More providers acknowledged using R&S for coping with work-related stress rather than for clinical decision-making. Still, the use of R&S associated with patient morbidity, mortality, and end-of-life issues emerged as a subtheme for both topics. Overall, there was no difference among provider groups relative to the use of R&S in clinical decision-making and in coping (p ϭ .350 and p ϭ .746, respectively). Among respondents who did use R&S, there were differences among provider groups on how R&S beliefs were used (both ps Ͻ .05). Understanding the role of R&S among healthcare providers may be necessary for addressing and targeting interventions to improve symptoms of burnout and healthcare provider well-being.

show abstract

Section: Religiosity and Spiritualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A mixed-methods approach to understanding the role of religion and spirituality in healthcare provider well-being.

Kelly

Hyer

Payne

et al. 2020

Psychology of Religion and Spirituality

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The intrinsic religiosity subscale evaluates religious commitment and motivations; responses are indicated on a Likertstyle 5-point scale (definitely not true [1] to definitely true of me [5]) with higher scores indicating higher levels of intrinsic religiosity. 13 The intrinsic religiosity subscale has widely established internal reliability (a ¼ 0.78-0.91), test-retest reliability, convergent validity, has been used in over 100 published studies, and is available in 10 languages. 14 The DUREL is available in Koenig and Bussing (2010).…”

Section: Measurement and Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spiritual Motivations to Practice Medicine: A Survey of Cancer Care Providers

Kelly

Myers

Kelly-Brown

et al. 2021

Am J Hosp Palliat Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: There is increased interest in the role of spirituality in the cancer care context, but how it may inspire individuals to pursue a career as a healthcare provider is unknown. We sought to determine the relationship between intrinsic religiosity, religious identity, provider role, and spiritual motivations to practice medicine. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was administered to healthcare providers at a large, Midwest Comprehensive Cancer Center. The relationship between provider type, intrinsic religiosity, religious identity, and spiritual motivations to practice medicine was assessed with binary logistic regression. Results: Among 340 participants, most were female (82.1%) or Caucasian (82.6%) and identified as being religious (57.5%); median age was 35 years (IQR: 31-48). Providers included nurses (64.7%), physicians (17.9%), and “other” (17.4%). Compared with physicians, nurses were less likely to agree that they felt responsible for reducing pain and suffering in the world (OR: 0.12, p = 0.03). Similarly, “other” providers were less likely than physicians to believe that the practice of medicine was a calling (OR: 0.28, p = 0.02). Providers with a high self-reported intrinsic religiosity demonstrated a much greater likelihood to believe that the practice of medicine is a calling (OR:1.75, p = 0.001), as well as believe that personal R&S beliefs influence the practice of medicine (OR:3.57, p < 0.001). Provider religious identity was not associated with spiritual motivations to practice medicine (all p > 0.05). Conclusion: Intrinsic religiosity had the strongest relationship with spiritual motivations to practice medicine. Understanding these motivations may inform interventions to avoid symptoms of provider burnout in cancer care.

show abstract

“…-Inventário de Religiosidade Intrínseca: conta com dez itens que almejam a mensurar a religiosidade intrínseca. O alfa de Cronbach (0,96) e a confiabilidade teste-reteste (Coeficiente de Correlação Intraclasse > 0,70), demonstram adequada consistência interna e confiabilidade do instrumento 31 ;…”

Section: O Terceiro Instrumento De Mensuração Mais Citado Nos Trabalhunclassified

Mensuração da espiritualidade/religiosidade em saúde no Brasil: uma revisão sistemática

Forti

Serbena

Scaduto

2020

Ciênc. saúde coletiva

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumo A espiritualidade/religiosidade tem sido apontada como uma importante dimensão para a área da saúde. O objetivo desse estudo é apresentar uma revisão sistemática sobre saúde e espiritualidade/religiosidade, como foco em instrumentos para sua mensuração. Buscou-se por trabalhos com as palavras-chave “escalas espiritualidade/religiosidade” e “escalas espiritualidade/religiosidade e saúde” nas bases de dados CAPES, DOAJ, Lilacs, Pubmed, Scielo e Web of Science, entre 2000 a 2017. Foram encontrados 500 trabalhos dos quais 35 foram selecionados, adotando critérios de originalidade, disponibilidade, língua (Espanhol, Inglês ou Português) e descrição de escalas específicas de espiritualidade/religiosidade adaptadas para o contexto brasileiro. Dessa amostra foram encontrados 16 instrumentos de mensuração. Os três instrumentos com mais estudos foram o WHOQOL-100 (incluindo sua versão reduzida e o módulo SRPB), a Escala de Bem-estar Espiritual (EBE) e a Escala de Coping Religioso/Espiritual (CRE) e sua versão abreviada (CRE-Breve). Pode-se concluir que ainda há escassos estudos na área, apesar de haver muitos instrumentos de mensuração, há poucos estudos continuados de validação para o contexto brasileiro.

show abstract

Development and validation of the Intrinsic Religiousness Inventory (IRI)

Cited by 7 publications

References 14 publications

A mixed-methods approach to understanding the role of religion and spirituality in healthcare provider well-being.

A mixed-methods approach to understanding the role of religion and spirituality in healthcare provider well-being.

Spiritual Motivations to Practice Medicine: A Survey of Cancer Care Providers

Mensuração da espiritualidade/religiosidade em saúde no Brasil: uma revisão sistemática

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About