DeVANET: Decentralized Software-Defined VANET Architecture

Kazmi, Afza; Khan, Muazzam A.; Akram, Muhammad

doi:10.1109/ic2ew.2016.12

Cited by 38 publications

(37 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As a solution, fallback recovery mechanisms as a backup inside each vehicle for the temporary uphold of network communication services are cited in Kazmi et al 75 As a solution, fallback recovery mechanisms as a backup inside each vehicle for the temporary uphold of network communication services are cited in Kazmi et al 75 …”

Section: Centralized Control Planementioning

confidence: 99%

“…76 The use of multiple controllers instead of a single controller allows to each controller to handle a part of the network and achieve scalability and reliability even in dense and heavy data loads. Kazmi et al 75 proposed a decentralized SDN architecture for safety related to VANET. Two paradigms allow the realization of decentralized control plane: edge computing and fog computing.…”

Section: Decentralized Control Planementioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, the main drawback of the centralized SDN controller is the inconsistency of the routing rules when the centralized controller access is interrupted. As a solution, fallback recovery mechanisms as a backup inside each vehicle for the temporary uphold of network communication services are cited in Kazmi et al 75…”

Section: Centralized Control Planementioning

confidence: 99%

“…78 The proposed work in Truong et al 26 combined fog computing that offers delay-sensitive and location-awareness services with the SDN architecture and assigns the control plane on the fog nodes to achieve real-time computing in distributed controller and to satisfy the demands of future vehicular routing scenario. Kazmi et al 75 proposed a decentralized SDN architecture for safety related to VANET. The control plane is partitioned into multiple controllers that are physically distributed on multiple machines having specific domain knowledge of different regions.…”

Section: Decentralized Control Planementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Survey on IoV routing protocols: Security and network architecture

Alouache

Nguyen²,

Aliouat

et al. 2018

Int J Communication

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As today, vehicles are equipped with wireless sensors and on-board computers capable of collecting and processing a large amount of data; they can communicate to each other via different communication types and through different relay nodes. Internet of Vehicles (IoV) routing protocols are deployed to monitor these communications with various strategies to achieve a high availability of communication. In this paper, we propose to extend an existing taxonomy representing the necessary criteria to build IoV routing algorithms, by adding two new important criteria: security aspect and network architecture. Enhanced vehicular routing protocols with different security mechanisms have been studied, compared, and classified with respect to the authentication, the integrity, the confidentiality, the nonrepudiation, and the availability of data and communications. Routing protocols using the software-defined networking (SDN) paradigm have also been reviewed in order to compare with those with traditional network architectures. Three types of SDN routing protocols, namely, centralized, decentralized, and hybrid control planes, have been analyzed. This survey will be useful for the choice of IoV routing protocols that take into account the flexibility, the scalability, and the intelligence of vehicular networks, as well as the security mechanisms against cyberattacks while being cost aware.

show abstract

Section: Centralized Control Planementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Decentralized Control Planementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Centralized Control Planementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Decentralized Control Planementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Survey on IoV routing protocols: Security and network architecture

Alouache

Nguyen²,

Aliouat

et al. 2018

Int J Communication

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There is also a high risk of controller bottleneck and control overhead in case of a huge number of vehicle requests. Given these limitations, authors in [11][12][13][14][15] propose to use multiple controllers instead of a single controller and each controller handles a part of the network. The use of multiple distributed controllers can achieve scalability and reliability even in dense and heavy data loads.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

dSDiVN: A Distributed Software-Defined Networking Architecture for Infrastructure-Less Vehicular Networks

Alioua¹,

Senouci²,

Moussaoui³

2017

Innovations for Community Services

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the last few years, the emerging network architecture paradigm of Software-Defined Networking (SDN), has become one of the most important technology to manage large scale networks such as Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANETs). Recently, several works have shown interest in the use of SDN paradigm in VANETs. SDN brings flexibility, scalability and management facility to current VANETs. However, almost all of proposed Software-Defined VANET (SDVN) architectures are infrastructure-based. This paper will focus on how to enable SDN in infrastructure-less vehicular environments. For this aim, we propose a novel distributed SDN-based architecture for uncovered infrastructure-less vehicular scenarios. It is a scalable cluster-based architecture with distributed mobile controllers and a reliable fallback recovery mechanism based on self-organized clustering and failure anticipation.

show abstract

Towards general Internet of Vehicles networking: Routing protocols survey

Ksouri

Jemili

Mosbah

et al. 2020

Concurrency and Computation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The specific characteristics of vehicular ad hoc networks, such as high speed of nodes and frequent topology changes, impose challenges for the routing process. In addition, the advent of the Internet of Vehicles (IoV) concept along with the autonomous and connected cars contribute to the proliferation of new innovative applications with different quality of service requirements, rising new challenging issues for data transfer.In this article, we review the different taxonomies of vehicular routing protocols, while giving an insight into the design of geographical protocols. Then, we outline several optimization techniques and paradigms used to enhance the routing process. Moreover, in order to promote the deployment of robust IoV routing protocols at large scale, we provide some directions for future research work.

show abstract

DeVANET: Decentralized Software-Defined VANET Architecture

Cited by 38 publications

References 13 publications

Survey on IoV routing protocols: Security and network architecture

Survey on IoV routing protocols: Security and network architecture

dSDiVN: A Distributed Software-Defined Networking Architecture for Infrastructure-Less Vehicular Networks

Towards general Internet of Vehicles networking: Routing protocols survey

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About