Determinants of quality of shared sanitation facilities in informal settlements: case study of Kisumu, Kenya

Abstract

BackgroundShared facilities are not recognised as improved sanitation due to challenges of maintenance as they easily can be avenues for the spread of diseases. Thus there is need to evaluate the quality of shared facilities, especially in informal settlements, where they are commonly used. A shared facility can be equated to a common good whose management depends on the users. If users do not work collectively towards keeping the facility clean, it is likely that the quality may depreciate due to lack of maintenance. This study examined the quality of shared sanitation facilities and used the common pool resource (CPR) management principles to examine the determinants of shared sanitation quality in the informal settlements of Kisumu, Kenya.MethodsUsing a multiple case study design, the study employed both quantitative and qualitative methods. In both phases, users of shared sanitation facilities were interviewed, while shared sanitation facilities were inspected. Shared sanitation quality was a score which was the dependent variable in a regression analysis. Interviews during the qualitative stage were aimed at understanding management practices of shared sanitation users. Qualitative data was analysed thematically by following the CPR principles.ResultsShared facilities, most of which were dirty, were shared by an average of eight households, and their quality decreased with an increase in the number of households sharing. The effect of numbers on quality is explained by behaviour reflected in the CPR principles, as it was easier to define boundaries of shared facilities when there were fewer users who cooperated towards improving their shared sanitation facility. Other factors, such as defined management systems, cooperation, collective decision making, and social norms, also played a role in influencing the behaviour of users towards keeping shared facilities clean and functional.ConclusionApart from hardware factors, quality of shared sanitation is largely due to group behaviour of users. The CPR principles form a crucial lens through which the dynamics of shared sanitation facilities in informal settlements can be understood. Development and policy efforts should incorporate group behaviour as they determine the quality of shared sanitation facilities.

Community Participation In Sanitation Kampung Program, Surakarta

“…It represented that in term of maintenance of toilet hygiene people still did not have awareness to do it independently. It is in accordance with a study by Simiyu et al, (2017) that showed the hygiene condition of public sanitation facilities is influenced by the number of people who use the facilities as well as the people's awareness.…”

Slum Health: Arresting COVID-19 and Improving Well-Being in Urban Informal Settlements

“…We prefer reaching standards for non-emergency situations, but know that in the short term, very few slums will be able to meet the WHO recommendations of 50 l per person per day of potable water. Sharing of water access points forces residents to spend hours seeking and queuing for water, both of which adversely impact health and economic status [ 60,61]. Lack of these basic services can contribute to increased violence and further spread of disease [62].…”

Relevant factors for collective action in the common-pool resources context

“…Disagreements also happen with the role of group size. In general, the literature argues that smaller groups have advantages in the possibilities of collective action, however, it had different effects among the analyzed studies (AGRAWAL; GOYAL, 2001;GAUTAM, 2007;SIMIYU et al, 2017).…”