2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep39128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Detailed analysis of charge transport in amorphous organic thin layer by multiscale simulation without any adjustable parameters

Abstract: Hopping-type charge transport in an amorphous thin layer composed of organic molecules is simulated by the combined use of molecular dynamics, quantum chemical, and Monte Carlo calculations. By explicitly considering the molecular structure and the disordered intermolecular packing, we reasonably reproduce the experimental hole and electron mobilities and their applied electric field dependence (Poole–Frenkel behaviour) without using any adjustable parameters. We find that the distribution of the density-of-st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Commonly site energy differences are inuenced by applied electric eld, electrostatic interaction and polarization. In this work, the charge transfer rate is tuned by site energy gap with the help of applied electric eld, [27][28][29] where, E i , and E j are site energies of i th and j th molecule, and e,Ẽ andR ij are electronic charge (1.6 Â 10 À19 C), applied electric eld and intermolecular distance (3.5Å), respectively. In this model, we assume the variation of site-energy gap (due to applied eld) as 0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075 and 0.1 eV, in this charge transport calculation.…”
Section: Charge Transfer Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly site energy differences are inuenced by applied electric eld, electrostatic interaction and polarization. In this work, the charge transfer rate is tuned by site energy gap with the help of applied electric eld, [27][28][29] where, E i , and E j are site energies of i th and j th molecule, and e,Ẽ andR ij are electronic charge (1.6 Â 10 À19 C), applied electric eld and intermolecular distance (3.5Å), respectively. In this model, we assume the variation of site-energy gap (due to applied eld) as 0, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075 and 0.1 eV, in this charge transport calculation.…”
Section: Charge Transfer Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming incoherent hopping of charge carriers between localized states and using advanced three-dimensional (3D) mechanistic modeling techniques, it is now possible to predict the macroscopic charge transport properties of organic semiconductors using microscopic information at the molecular level, including a Gaussian distribution of site energies, the spatial packing of the material, the distribution of charge transfer integrals, and the reorganization energies [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Device modeling has been carried out using drift-diffusion [13][14][15][16][17][18], master-equation (ME) [19][20][21][22][23], and kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) [2,[24][25][26][27][28] simulation methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their small size partially hinders intermolecular charge transfer and they generally suffer from poor charge conductivity, especially in their pristine form. 248,249 Polymers allow less control over electronic properties and the polymerization steps sometimes limit the chemical composition of the monomer itself. 196 A less than perfect control over the polymerization reaction may prevent good batch-to-batch reproducibility and material properties.…”
Section: Organic Hole Transporting Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%