2015
DOI: 10.1049/mnl.2015.0046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and investigation of double gate Schottky barrier MOSFET using gate engineering

Abstract: For the first time, a distinctive approach to design and investigate double-gate Schottky Barrier MOSFET (DG SB-MOSFET) using gate engineering is reported. Three isolated gates (one Control gate and two N-gates) of different work-functions on both sides of the gate oxides have been used. In the proposed device, without the need of doping, n-type region is formed at the source/drain contact-channel interfaces by inducing electron in the ultrathin intrinsic silicon channel using appropriate work-function metal N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, metal material such as Erbium can be selected to form an ErSi interface between the S/D electrodes and the semiconductor region, and the height of SB for electrons in conduction band φ bn for ErSi is much smaller than the one for holes in the valence band φ bp . , Thereafter, compared to the holes flowing from the valence band of the semiconductor into the metal, it is easier for the electrons to flow from the metal into the conduction band of the semiconductor. However, SBs are formed between the source/drain regions and the semiconductor region and the thermionic emission efficiency is reduced by this SB and is smaller than the case of MOSFETs with a heavily doped source/drain, which has already strengthened the band bending to enhance the intensity of the band to band tunneling effect to reduce the source/drain resistance induced by the SB. For SB-MOSFET, there is no heavily doped source/drain to conquer the SB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, metal material such as Erbium can be selected to form an ErSi interface between the S/D electrodes and the semiconductor region, and the height of SB for electrons in conduction band φ bn for ErSi is much smaller than the one for holes in the valence band φ bp . , Thereafter, compared to the holes flowing from the valence band of the semiconductor into the metal, it is easier for the electrons to flow from the metal into the conduction band of the semiconductor. However, SBs are formed between the source/drain regions and the semiconductor region and the thermionic emission efficiency is reduced by this SB and is smaller than the case of MOSFETs with a heavily doped source/drain, which has already strengthened the band bending to enhance the intensity of the band to band tunneling effect to reduce the source/drain resistance induced by the SB. For SB-MOSFET, there is no heavily doped source/drain to conquer the SB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This significantly increases the necessary expenses for production. Comparing to the abrupt junction of MOSFET based on doping technology, Schottky Barrier MOSFET (SB-MOSFET) uses metal materials as the source and drain (S/D) regions of the device [ [6] , [7] , [8] ]. Due to that the enhancement of on state current can be achieved by adopting different alloy electrodes to form Schottky barrier with lower heights [ [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] ], the Schottky barrier height between the S/D electrodes and the conduction band of semiconductor region (φ Bn ) is usually much lower than that between the S/D electrodes and the valence band (φ Bp ) for n type SB-MOSFET [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is necessary to use expensive millisecond annealing technology to achieve abrupt junctions at the nanometer scale [3]. Schottky barrier MOSFET (SB-MOSFET) forms shallow Schottky barrier instead of the p-n junction barrier of MOSFET [4][5][6]. The metallic source/drain (S/D) architecture holds the advantage to relax severe constraints imposed to conventional implanted S/D [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%