2000 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems. Emerging Technologies for the 21st Century. Proceedings (IEEE Cat No
DOI: 10.1109/iscas.2000.857435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Design and implementation of a 16 by 16 low-power two's complement multiplier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To see why this is achievable, we observe that the outputs of the on-the-fly converter arrive at the multiplexer 11 unit delays earlier than the selection signal of the multiplexer. Based on this observation, the work in [6] proposed to use a strategic array of (3, 2), (5, 3), (7,4) compressors to enhance the operation speed of the part of the least significant product (LSP) terms.…”
Section: Conventional Left-to-right Full-width Multipliermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To see why this is achievable, we observe that the outputs of the on-the-fly converter arrive at the multiplexer 11 unit delays earlier than the selection signal of the multiplexer. Based on this observation, the work in [6] proposed to use a strategic array of (3, 2), (5, 3), (7,4) compressors to enhance the operation speed of the part of the least significant product (LSP) terms.…”
Section: Conventional Left-to-right Full-width Multipliermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the speed-up design [6] focused on reducing the signal propagation delay of the LSP part. However, in the design of fixed-width left-to-right multipliers, most gates lying in the LSP part will be deleted.…”
Section: The Left-to-right Fixed-width Multiplier 31 Selection Of Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [2], this LRCF approach was extended to produce 2n-bit product. It was also discovered that glitches in L-R reduction arrays were smaller than in the conventional R-L arrays, especially for data with large dynamic range [5,20,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%