2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-09352013000600027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Desempenho bioeconômico de sistemas intensivos de cria e de ciclo completo por meio de simulação

Abstract: Foram simulados quatro sistemas de produção de bovinos de corte a partir de dados zootécnicos e econômicos de uma fazenda de ciclo completo situada no município de Corinto, região central de Minas Gerais. Utilizou-se o programa de simulação bioeconômica Embrapec. Os sistemas simulados foram: ciclo completo com uso de cruzamento industrial (CompCRUZA), ciclo completo exclusivamente com zebuíno (CompZEBU), ciclo de cria com uso de cruzamento industrial (CriaCRUZA), ciclo de cria exclusivamente com zebuíno (CriaZ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fixed operating cos was considered that which did not vary according to the level of production and VOC, the opposite. Total operational cost was the sum of VOC + FOC and the total cost was TOC plus the opportunity cost (Barbosa and Souza, 2007;Barbosa et al, 2010;Santana et al, 2013). The revenues of activity were composed of the sales of lambs (R$450.00), lamb sales intended for slaughter, and sale of disposal animals (ewe).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fixed operating cos was considered that which did not vary according to the level of production and VOC, the opposite. Total operational cost was the sum of VOC + FOC and the total cost was TOC plus the opportunity cost (Barbosa and Souza, 2007;Barbosa et al, 2010;Santana et al, 2013). The revenues of activity were composed of the sales of lambs (R$450.00), lamb sales intended for slaughter, and sale of disposal animals (ewe).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The profit was the subtraction of revenue from TC. The profitability was the net margin divided by revenue and return net margin divided by the total investment (Barbosa and Souza, 2007;Barbosa et al, 2010;Santana et al, 2013). Cash flow was accomplished by deducting the expenditures from the revenue (TOC − depreciation), which resulted in the balance that is fixed every year by the interest rate of 6% per annum (Barbosa and Souza, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The representation was higher for animals (64.61%), dietary supplements (12.33%), and depreciation (5.22%). The intensive nature of the production system shows that the depreciation of machinery, improvements, pastures, and crops accounted for 5.22% of the total cost, i.e., a small percentage when compared with the cow-calf farms and whole production farms, being 28.1%, 27.1%, and 18.8%, 20.1% for the following systems: cow-calf farms with animals from crossbreeding (Zebu vs Angus) and Zebu breed, whole production farm of animals from crossbreeding (Zebu vs Angus), and Zebu breed, respectively (Santana et al 2013). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different crosses between Bos taurus taurus and Bos taurus indicus generate positive results for the efficiency of a production system, mainly in terms of carcass weight, yield of meat cuts, and meat tenderness (Barcellos et al, 2017). Santana et al (2013) described economic gains from the use of crosses in bioeconomic simulations with full-cycle and pre-weaning systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%