2018 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology 2018
DOI: 10.1109/vlsit.2018.8510672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Demonstration of Ultra-Low Voltage and Ultra Low Power STT-MRAM designed for compatibility with 0x node embedded LLC applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of Hopfield like recurrent neural networks (RNNs) with memristive devices has already been successfully demonstrated in a variety of tasks (Milo et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2020b). As an example of memristive based coupled oscillator network, Ignatov et al (2017) used a network of self-sustained van der Pol oscillators coupled (Kim et al, 2011;Lee et al, 2011) 10 11 (Kim et al, 2010) 10 12 (Saida et al, 2017) > 10 15 (Udayakumar et al, 2013) SET/RESET time 100 ps (Torrezan et al, 2011) >100 ns, 10 ns 20 ns (Jan et al, 2018) 30 ns, 30 ns 85 ps (Choi et al, 2016) (IRDS, 2020) 3 ns (Kitagawa et al, 2012) (Francois et al, 2019) Read current 100 pA (Luo et al, 2016) 25 µA (De Sandre et al, 2010) 20 µA (Kitagawa et al, 2012) 0.8 nA (Bruno et al, 2016), device diameter 300 nm)…”
Section: Memristive Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of Hopfield like recurrent neural networks (RNNs) with memristive devices has already been successfully demonstrated in a variety of tasks (Milo et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2020b). As an example of memristive based coupled oscillator network, Ignatov et al (2017) used a network of self-sustained van der Pol oscillators coupled (Kim et al, 2011;Lee et al, 2011) 10 11 (Kim et al, 2010) 10 12 (Saida et al, 2017) > 10 15 (Udayakumar et al, 2013) SET/RESET time 100 ps (Torrezan et al, 2011) >100 ns, 10 ns 20 ns (Jan et al, 2018) 30 ns, 30 ns 85 ps (Choi et al, 2016) (IRDS, 2020) 3 ns (Kitagawa et al, 2012) (Francois et al, 2019) Read current 100 pA (Luo et al, 2016) 25 µA (De Sandre et al, 2010) 20 µA (Kitagawa et al, 2012) 0.8 nA (Bruno et al, 2016), device diameter 300 nm)…”
Section: Memristive Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some works suggest that SOT-MRAM requires a lower write time and a lower write energy than STT-MRAM [40][41][42][43]. On the other hand, the results presented in Reference [26] show that VCMA-MeRAMs outperform STT-MRAM in terms of area, speed and energy consumption.…”
Section: Wl Slmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed circuit simulation for two types of emerging memories with distinctive resistance ranges. For MRAM memory cells we assumed 1 k for LRS and 2.5 k for HRS (based on assumptions of MTJ CD ∼ 80nm, RA ∼ 5 .µm 2 , and TMR ∼ 150% [28], [29]). Respective values for PCRAM of 30 k for LRS and 2 M for HRS were assumed based on [30].…”
Section: B Impact Of Design Parameters and Parasitic Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%