2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.04.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Deformation mechanisms in a metastable beta titanium twinning induced plasticity alloy with high yield strength and high strain hardening rate

Abstract: SUMMARYAs predicted by the notion that sister chromatid cohesion is mediated by entrapment of sister DNAs inside cohesin rings, there is perfect correlation between co-entrapment of circular minichromosomes and sister chromatid cohesion. In most cells where cohesin loads without conferring cohesion, it does so by entrapment of individual DNAs. However, cohesin with a hinge domain whose positively charged lumen is neutralized loads and moves along chromatin despite failing to entrap DNAs. Thus, cohesin engages … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

7
53
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(10 reference statements)
7
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The invariant and undistorted twinning planes and shear (conjugate) directions between {5 8 11}T and β matrix were experimentally found to be K 1 = {5 8 11}, K 2 = {−1 0 1}, η 1 = {−5 −1 3} and η 2 = {1 1 1}, consistent to the theoretical prediction and the experimental observations in cubic Fe-Ni alloy [19,21]. Usually, SIM is the common mechanism to accommodate interface strain misfit [9,10,12] in TWIP/TRIP alloys. Here the SIM was completely suppressed despite the dense nano {112} < 111 > twinning (112T) intersecting 332T (discussed below).…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The invariant and undistorted twinning planes and shear (conjugate) directions between {5 8 11}T and β matrix were experimentally found to be K 1 = {5 8 11}, K 2 = {−1 0 1}, η 1 = {−5 −1 3} and η 2 = {1 1 1}, consistent to the theoretical prediction and the experimental observations in cubic Fe-Ni alloy [19,21]. Usually, SIM is the common mechanism to accommodate interface strain misfit [9,10,12] in TWIP/TRIP alloys. Here the SIM was completely suppressed despite the dense nano {112} < 111 > twinning (112T) intersecting 332T (discussed below).…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…Upon increasing the strain to 0.10 and to 0.15, the multiplication and growth of both variants are clearly noticed in Figure 2(b,c). It is worth noting that SIM transformation was not observed during the whole plastic deformation, indicating that the TRIP effects was fully suppressed due to the higher stability of this alloy when compared with the combined TWIP and/or TRIP modes Ti-alloys [7][8][9][10]13,17]. The role of the SIM-produced α is likely to relax the zones where strong stress concentration occurs (typically at the crossing zone of twins).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…a long steady plateau in the intermediate stage (10% -20% strain) of deformation. In contrast with this, Ti alloys with combined TWIP/TRIP effects usually exhibit a much higher strain-hardening rate [31,33] , which increases from early stages and achieves a maximum value at intermediate strains. The increased strain-hardening rate in TWIP/TRIP alloys is caused by the simultaneous activation of mechanical twinning and martensitic transformation, where the primary α martensite may produce extra barriers to obstruct dis- location motions [33] .…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 93%