2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Decomposition of eucalypt harvest residues as affected by management practices, climate and soil properties across southeastern Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bark often has the slowest decomposition rates observed among eucalyptus HR components (Shammas et al 2003, Epron et al 2006, Hernández et al 2009). However, recent studies have shown that bark retention might accelerate eucalyptus HR decomposition in nutrient‐poor tropical sites because (1) it creates a physical protection that results in optimized conditions for decomposition, for example, higher humidity and protection against disturbances; and (2) its high nutrient content, especially calcium, offsets any possible inhibitory effect of chemical complexity (Souza et al 2016, Ferreira et al 2016). In our study, bark had a negligible effect on HR decomposition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Bark often has the slowest decomposition rates observed among eucalyptus HR components (Shammas et al 2003, Epron et al 2006, Hernández et al 2009). However, recent studies have shown that bark retention might accelerate eucalyptus HR decomposition in nutrient‐poor tropical sites because (1) it creates a physical protection that results in optimized conditions for decomposition, for example, higher humidity and protection against disturbances; and (2) its high nutrient content, especially calcium, offsets any possible inhibitory effect of chemical complexity (Souza et al 2016, Ferreira et al 2016). In our study, bark had a negligible effect on HR decomposition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportions used and HR chemical characterization are shown in Supplemental Table 1. More details about HR chemical composition can be obtained elsewhere (Souza et al 2016, Ferreira et al 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of stable isotope techniques (e.g., 13 C) to assess the contribution of different vegetative sources of SOM (Epron, Mouanda, Mareschal, & Lydie‐Stella, ; Hernández et al, ; Souza et al, ), alterations in SOM due to land‐use changes (Vilas Boas, Almeida, Teixeira, Souza, & Silva, ), and to discern the origins of soil C–CO 2 (Millard, Midwood, Hunt, Barbour, & Whitehead, ; Oliveira et al, ) has been reported widely in the literature. In these studies, for the 13 C isotope technique to be useful, there must either be differences in the natural 13 C abundances between soils (soils cultivated with C 3 or C 4 plants) and plants (C 3 or C 4 plants) or a 13 C enrichment in the plant material ( 13 C labelling).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While burning can initially improve soil fertility, it can also lead to large losses of N via volatilisation [10][11][12][13], and P, Ca, and K through leaching, as well as water and wind erosion [13][14][15]. Retention of harvest residues, especially bark, acts to conserve nutrients and leads to their controlled release in a way that minimizes losses from leaching and potentially supplies the amount of nutrients required for stand development in the next rotation [16][17][18][19][20]. Hence, understanding decomposition rates and nutrient release from harvest residues, including bark, is important for informing residue and nutrient management over successive rotations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%