Decomposing Influence Strategies: Argument Structure and Dependence as Determinants of the Effectiveness of Influence Strategies in Gaining Channel Member Compliance

Abstract

Although there is considerable research examining the effects of influence strategies on relational outcomes, research has been silent on the effectiveness of influence strategies in achieving the primary objective: channel member compliance. The authors develop a theoretical model that predicts that noncoercive influence strategies (Rationality, Recommendations, Information Exchange, and Requests) with an argument structure that contains more thorough content result in relatively greater levels of compliance. The model further predicts that coercive influence strategies (Promises and Threats) result in compliance only when target dependence levels are high. The authors develop a new influence strategy, Rationality, which represents a noncoercive strategy with a full argument structure. In general, empirical findings support the theoretical model. However, in contrast to expectations, the use of Recommendations had a negative effect on compliance. Post hoc analysis revealed a significant interaction between trust and Recommendations on compliance, thus providing an explanation for this unexpected result. When trust is low, Recommendation strategies are counterproductive. The authors discuss implications of the findings and directions for further research.

Old habits die hard: exploring the effect of supply chain dependency and culture on performance outcomes and relationship satisfaction

“…The theory on power and dependence discusses the importance of maintaining an equilibrium in supply chain relationships (Dwyer et al 1987;Liu et al 2009;Payan and McFarland 2005;) and while we found that the interdependence was a key reason why the partners remained in the relationship (Cannon et al 2010), when a supply chain member gained perceived advantage they attempted to use that power. So, even while interdependence existed, opportunistic behaviours were exposed.…”

The Moderating Effect of Knowledge Transfer on Satisfaction-Performance Relationship

“…The reliability of the scale was calculated using Cronbach's Alpha which was 90%. In order to measure satisfaction, we browed and modified two items from Payan and McFarland, (2005) and one each from Kumar et al (1992) and Razzaque and Boon, (2003). The items were chosen to express overall satisfaction.…”

“…affective and psychosocial) aspects of the relationship (Geyskens et al 1999;Geyskens and Steenkamp, 2000). Another view (Payan and McFarland, 2005) accepts satisfaction as the overall satisfaction and/or happiness in the relationship between firms. In this study we considered overall satisfaction about the all aspects of the relationship.…”

Developing Interpersonal Influence in Retail Purchasing Networks: An Exploratory Analysis of Tie Quantity, Tie Strength, and Tie Type

“…In a retail context, interpersonal influence depicts a retail buyer's ability and efficacy to modify trading partners' behaviors by gaining compliance toward a particular course of action (Frazier & Summers, 1984;Payan & McFarland, 2005). When social networks are involved, perceptions and attributions about such behaviors are enhanced if the individual gaining compliance is believed to be tied to other prominent individuals in the network (Kilduff & Krackhardt, 1994).…”