Cyber-physical systems for construction industry

Corrêa, Fabiano Rogério

doi:10.1109/icphys.2018.8387690

Cited by 36 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The first one, Table 2, presents the main gains noted on at least six occasions during our review and generally credited to the BIM approaches (as we had noticed in a completely different study relative to the BIM Maturity Model [2]). However, the summary in Table 3 reveals six of the most frequently achieved "original" improvements to be credited to technologies such as IoT [3], drones [4], and 3D printing [5], the latter facilitating, for example, prefabrication. Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing are presented as solutions of interest in the improvement of feedback or in the automation of choices [6,7].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Industry 4.0 and BIM: Do They Share the Same Objectives?

Joblot

Danjou

Pellerin

et al. 2021

Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, many changes have been taking place within the construction sector which is much more prone to innovate than in the past. New forms of processes are emerging with the introduction of digital technologies. This article aims to shed light on recent scientific advances that link Industry 4.0 to this sector. To this end, a review of articles published over the past 10 years reporting experiences and gains from 4.0 technologies applied to construction was conducted. It turns out that recent technological developments have brought new functionalities and new perspectives to companies. Some of these were not initially claimed with the sole deployment of a BIM approach. These new opportunities have ultimately raised questions as to whether and how they could impact the speed at which a digital transformation of the sector could take place.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Industry 4.0 and BIM: Do They Share the Same Objectives?

Joblot

Danjou

Pellerin

et al. 2021

Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In [58], the application of CPS for various purposes in the construction industry was analyzed, such as for construction component tracking, temporary structure monitoring, and mobile crane safety. Furthermore, a cyber model named Petri Net [75] was adopted as a model for a construction process and two application scenarios of automatic assembly and traditional structural masonry were simulated. In [76], a citizen service center was presented for the verification of the technical feasibility and implementation effect of a CPS framework, in which the real-time construction model acts as the digital twin of the building under construction.…”

Section: The Fourth Industrial Revolution (4ir)mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Review of Construction 4.0 in the Context of the BIM 4.0 Premise

Begić

Galić

2021

Buildings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents a systematic review of Construction 4.0 in the context of the building information modeling (BIM) 4.0 premise. It comprises a review of the industry in the pre-fourth industrial revolution (4IR) age, the current and anticipated development of the 4IR, Construction 4.0’s origin and applications, and the synergy of its main drivers, i.e., the synergy of BIM with the internet of things (IoT) and big data (BD). The main aim of the paper is to determine the Construction 4.0 drivers and to what extent are they initialized by the 4IR, their development and their synergy with BIM, and the direction of BIM’s implementation in the construction phase. It was found that the main drivers of Construction 4.0, which originated from the 4IR, are BIM, IoT, and BD, but with specific implementations. The results of the analysis of BIM with IoT and/or BD revealed that the integrative approaches combining the aforementioned drivers show signs of project enhancement by providing significant benefits, such as improved real-time monitoring, data exchange and analysis, construction planning, and modeling. Furthermore, it was revealed that the main drivers are mostly applied in the project’s preconstruction phase, which is continuously developing and becoming more automated. The state-of-the-art review presented in this paper suggests that BIM is in transition, adopting Construction 4.0 to become BIM 4.0.

show abstract

“…In the preconstruction phase, the integration of CPS and AR technology could provide real environmental information to provide a basis for construction planning (Khalid et al , 2014). During the construction process, Correa (2018) achieved the rapid detection of prefabricated construction progress using a CPS system (including BIM and sensors). After construction, the virtual engineering model and data contained in the CPS system is conducive to the entire project delivery (Anumba et al , 2010).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cyber physical system for safety management in smart construction site

Jiang

Ding

Zhou

2020

ECAM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeConstruction safety has been a long-term problem in the development of the construction industry. An increasing number of smart construction sites have been designed using different techniques to reduce injuries caused by construction accidents and achieve proactive risk control. However, comprehensive smart construction site safety management solutions and applications have yet to be developed. Thus, this study proposes a smart construction site framework for safety management.Design/methodology/approachA safety management system based on a cyber-physical system is proposed. The system establishes risk data synchronization mapping between the virtual construction and physical construction sites through scene reconstruction design, data awareness, data communication and data processing modules. Personnel, mechanical and other risks on site will be warned and controlled.FindingsThe results of the case study have proved the management benefits of the system. On-site workers gradually realized that they should enter the construction site based on the standard process. And the number of people close to the construction hazard areas decreased.Research limitations/implicationsThere are some limitations in the technology of smart construction site. The modeling speed can be faster, the data collection can be timelier, and the identification of unsafe behavior can be integrated into the system. Construction quality and efficiency issues in a virtual construction site will also be solved in further research.Practical implicationsIn this paper, this system is actually applied in the mega project management process. More practical projects can use the management ideas and method of this paper to ensure on-site safety.Originality/valueThis study is among the first attempts to build a complete smart construction site based on CPS and apply it in practice. Personnel, mechanical, components, environment information will be displayed on the virtual construction site. It will greatly promote the development of the intellectualized construction industry in the future.

show abstract

Cyber-physical systems for construction industry

Cited by 36 publications

References 11 publications

Industry 4.0 and BIM: Do They Share the Same Objectives?

Industry 4.0 and BIM: Do They Share the Same Objectives?

A Systematic Review of Construction 4.0 in the Context of the BIM 4.0 Premise

Cyber physical system for safety management in smart construction site

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About