1986
DOI: 10.1016/0001-8791(86)90007-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Creativity differences among managers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, McNichols et al found no evidence of a response set influencing scores on JSS-R toward either the highly satisfied or highly dissatisfied ends of the continuum. The JSS-R has been employed in some subsequent studies of vocational behavior (e.g., Chusmir & Koberg, 1986).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, McNichols et al found no evidence of a response set influencing scores on JSS-R toward either the highly satisfied or highly dissatisfied ends of the continuum. The JSS-R has been employed in some subsequent studies of vocational behavior (e.g., Chusmir & Koberg, 1986).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, women remain quiescent despite some support in the literature for the widely presumed notion, that females are more right-side brain thinkers, which is often associated with creativity. Chusmir and Koberg (1986) report that the literature is inconclusive in identifying potential gender differences in creativity but find that male creativity is positively associated with need achievement whilst for women creativity is a predictor of need affiliation. Moreover, Kwaniewska and Necka (2005) found that women are more perceptive of (non)creative work environments and Conti, Collins, and Picariello (2001) determined that female creativity was suppressed in competitive environments.…”
Section: Gender Cookery and Creativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the negative relationship reported when conducting the regression analyses, between creativity and intention to leave either current job or occupation this finding is counter intuitive and warrants further investigation. Work which has investigated the variability of the creativity construct for females in the workplace -be it for need affiliation (Chusmir & Koberg, 1986), perception of non-creative environments (Kwaniewska & Necka, 2005) or vulnerability to competition (Conti et al, 2001) -may indeed be factors. Interestingly though, the significantly lower female score for the item 'I have input on menu design' indicates the (occupational) power relationship in professional kitchens favours males (White, Jones, & James, 2005).…”
Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We included gender because male and female workers might have differential access to opportunities to engage in IRB (Ohlott, Ruderman, & McCauley, 1994). For the same reason, we included job level as a control variable; jobs at higher managerial levels often provide more opportunities for individuals to engage in IRB than first-line supervisors have (Chusmir & Koberg, 1986). We included education level as a control variable because it is positively correlated with the ability to generate and articulate innovative ideas (Ng & Feldman, 2009b).…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%