2021
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1924017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covid-19 vaccine, acceptance, and concern of safety from public perspective in the state of Odisha, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, COVID-19 vaccine was mostly believed to be as safe as the government portrays it to be. This was similar to findings in India [22,23]. This finding suggests that potential vaccine hesitancy in Nigeria may not be associated with mistrust in government.…”
Section: Research Articlesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In our study, COVID-19 vaccine was mostly believed to be as safe as the government portrays it to be. This was similar to findings in India [22,23]. This finding suggests that potential vaccine hesitancy in Nigeria may not be associated with mistrust in government.…”
Section: Research Articlesupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Perceived barriers were evaluated by three questions including vaccine safety, effectiveness, and the possibility of infection after vaccination. Many studies also found that doubts regarding vaccine safety and efficacy were the main reasons for vaccine reluctance (11,14,18,21,22,46,47). Therefore, healthcare providers should use face-to-face education, autodialers, mail, and text messages to emphasize the COVID-19 pandemic situation, the benefits of vaccination, and the safety and efficacy of vaccines, to address parental concerns about vaccines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The articles of included studies were published in 2020 (n = 18) and in 2021 (n = 154). The studies involved 814,691 participants from 50 countries across six regions in the world represented as African region (n = 14) (17-30), American region (n = 34) (7,, Eastern Mediterranean region (n = 33) (8, 64-95), European region (n = 46) (96-141), South-East Asian region (n = 8) (5,(142)(143)(144)(145)(146)(147)(148) and Western Pacific region (n = 31) (149-179). There were two global studies (180,181), one study combined countries in the European region and Western Pacific region (182), one study involved countries in the American region and Western Pacific region (183), one study involved the African region and Middle East countries (184) and one study involved countries in the African region, American region and South-East Asian region (185).…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%