Contradictions of institutional and economic environment: Experience of Kazakhstan

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to assess the quality of economic growth in Kazakhstan. An attempt has been made to provide an analysis of the institutional and economic environment and an econometric assessment of the real indicators of the country's development. Research Design & Methods:To assess the degree of influence of certain indicators on economic growth, a regression analysis was carried out. For this, data were collected from 15 countries for 2000-2018. Since the sample combines temporal and spatial data, a panel data regression model was built to analyze the effect of the considered explanatory variables on GDP. To study a model with these characteristics, two different models can be used: a fixed effects (FE) model and a random effects (RE) model. Findings: Based on the historical and logical analysis of theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of economic development and the constructed regression model of panel data, it is shown that an increase in the level of indicators selected in official statistics has a small effect on economic growth, that is, there is a discrepancy between target indicators government programs and actual results. The institutional features of the Kazakhstani development model, which cause economic lag, are revealed. Implications & Recommendations:The current cyclical transition, complicated by the Covid-19 pandemic, has revealed weak links in the economies of many countries, caused by systemic contradictions accumulated over 30 years. Kazakhstan, as a country that has been building market relations only since the end of the 20th century, found itself in the grip of not only economic and political, but also institutional costs. One of the problems hindering the economic development of the nation is the contradiction between the political ambitions of the authorities and the real results of the implementation of state programs, the loss of public confidence.Contribution & Value Added: The country's development prospects are primarily predetermined by the state's ability to solve accumulated problems. Therefore, it is important to identify them, solve, and then predict the real parameters of the country's development. The importance of such a methodological approach is noted by scientists from the post-Soviet countries, who study the factors that hinder the development of these countries.

Production Functions for Assessing the Volumes of Agricultural Production in the Regions of Russia

“…In our study, spatial data were used to characterize the factors under consideration and the resulting indicators for agricultural sectors in the regions of Russia. It should be noted that spatial data allows you to get away from the problems that are characteristic of time series (Tulegenova et al, 2021). The advantages of using spatial data in the evaluation of production functions are described in detail in the work (Charoenrat and Harvie, 2013).…”

Housing affordability analysis in Kazakhstan based on D-HAQ model

“…Even though tens of millions of square meters of residential buildings are put into operation every year in Kazakhstan, the socio-economic problem of housing affordability persists. Moreover, (Tulegenova et al, 2021) believe that the real socio-economic state of the country is "veiled" in official statistics. Thus, according to the Bureau of National statistics of the Agency for Strategic planning and reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the commissioning of residential buildings over the past ten years has increased by 2,6 times from 6531 thousand square meters in 2011 to 16910 thousand square meters in 2021.…”