Contradictions in Higher Education

Dzelzkaleja, Laura; Sen., Jānis Kapenieks

doi:10.2478/jtes-2018-0008

Cited by 9 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…There some students were confusedly not informed or even did not know exactly what had happened at the university or as new students they should have been aware of the whole process. In fact, this result is a bit different from the research by Laura DzelzkalÁja and Jnis Kapenieks [20] in which socialization is mostly, if not 100 per cent, attended by new students, as it was like a game plan for them to follow the whole process during the years of study. The research also states that it is essential to have a clear interactive university structural framework that put into action the university mission and vision and restrain any cultural and political effects on the implementation of technological strategies…”

Section: Socialization Of Academic Processcontrasting

confidence: 81%

The Development of Academic Services Model in Enhancing Better Graduates Quality

Mulyani¹,

Gaffar²,

Suryadi³

et al. 2021

Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Research of Educational Administration and Management (ICREAM 2020)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A good and integrated academic system service is one of the factors that can determine the quality of graduates of higher education institutions. The research focuses on the analysis and exploration of an integrated academic service system implemented by the Pertiwi School of Economics, which consists of a new student admissions process, an academic service information process, a teaching and learning process, an assessment system and an overall service process. This research is a preliminary study to examine students ' perceptions of the current integrated services. Research data were collected from students in semesters 4, 6 and 8 through a survey conducted. The results showed that, in general, students were not satisfied with the academic system services currently being run at a dissatisfaction rate of 47.7%. Of course, this figure is very large and needs better handling. This figure clearly illustrates the overall results, which are focused on the assumption that the admission process for new students is not ideal at a rate of 53.3 per cent, while the satisfaction with the academic information process is 73.3 per cent, while the satisfaction rate with the services provided by lecturers in the preparation for learning is 66.7 per cent, and the innovation and creativity of the learning process is 66.7 per cent. The novelty of this study is the discovery of a more integrated service model. The results of this study are also preliminary studies for further research using the Design by Research (DBR) research model.

show abstract

Section: Socialization Of Academic Processcontrasting

confidence: 81%

The Development of Academic Services Model in Enhancing Better Graduates Quality

Mulyani¹,

Gaffar²,

Suryadi³

et al. 2021

Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Research of Educational Administration and Management (ICREAM 2020)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The changes happening in society has a big affect on education (Mohammadi & Moradi, 2017). The global change in the field of education caused by the tremendous change in technology, globalization, and human mobility has changed the expectation in the educational system (Dzelzkaleja & Kapenieks, 2018). This was confirmed by Van Hong, Tuyen, & Luong, (2018) who revealed that 21st-century teachers and lecturers were required to have at least three competencies, one of which was the ability to apply technology in learning.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 98%

A Model of Lecturer Performance Evaluation: Sustainable Lecturer Performance Mapping

Retnowati¹,

Mardapi²,

Kartowagiran³

et al. 2021

INT J INSTRUCTION

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainable lecturer performance mapping needed a valid evaluation model. The absence of such a model brings about lecturer performance evaluation which was neither systematic nor sustainable. The study aimed to develop a valid and reliable model of lecturer performance evaluation. This research was a development research model. The model developed in the study has two components, namely: (1) computer application containing instrument to measure the lecturer performance, scoring guide, accomplishment criteria and their syntax; and (2) the user's guide for the application. The lecturer performance instruments were analyzed using content validity and construct validity. The instrument's content validity was proven by Aiken Formula, while the construct validity by Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and the instrument's reliability was estimated by Cronbach Alpha Formula. MANOVA was used as the hypothesis test of the implementation toward the models among the faculties. The result of trials on the model showed that all items of the instrument had met the content validity standard of 0.73, the construct of the lecturer performance instrument in learning (planning, process, and assessment) was in good categories. The results showed that the lecturer performance evaluation model was valid, reliable, and comprehensive. The results also showed that the performance of the Faculty of Math and Science lecturers in learning was the highest.

show abstract

“…Moreover, as faculty at higher education institutions are scholars, they have the need to teach and research at the same time so as to publish and get promoted and tenured (Quimbo & Sulabo, 2014). The knowledge provided at academic institutes by these scholars is useful to be applied in practice if knowledge management is maintained in higher education institutions (Dhamdhere, 2015).…”

Section: The Development Of Lecturers In Higher Education Institutions In Vietnammentioning

confidence: 99%

The Professional Development of Academic Staff in Higher Education Institution

Pham

2021

Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Higher education is given increasing recognition by national governments and international agencies throughout the world to become a crucial incentive for sustainable development goals. In the national development of intellectual force at present, the Vietnam policy of education and training, which is of great importance, is the decisive factor for the economic growth and social development as set out by the government. Therefore, the educational development is the responsibility of both the government and the society. It is now clear that the academic staff in higher education institutions is the core force, playing a decisive role in ensuring the quality of higher education as in the case of the International University – Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City. The paper investigated the research studies by the university academic staff through their annual publications and the number of lecturers with Doctoral degrees and professorship. The results showed their research studies contributed to the development of the institution in particular, and at the same time predicted how much the stakeholders benefited from this in general. This study may contribute to developing the quality of higher education institutions regarding the promotion of international publications by the higher education faculties.

show abstract

Contradictions in Higher Education

Cited by 9 publications

References 26 publications

The Development of Academic Services Model in Enhancing Better Graduates Quality

The Development of Academic Services Model in Enhancing Better Graduates Quality

A Model of Lecturer Performance Evaluation: Sustainable Lecturer Performance Mapping

The Professional Development of Academic Staff in Higher Education Institution

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About