2008
DOI: 10.1080/13571510701830556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contractual Design as a Determinant of Performance: Evidence from Franchising

Abstract: This empirical note deals with the contractual design of relationships between producers and retailers. It provides evidence on the links between the features of vertical contracts organizing franchising networks and the performances of these networks. An agency perspective is used to understand the structure of contracts. We focus on the relevance of vertical restraints by the upstream firm to prevent retailers from free‐riding in the distribution networks. From six frequent contractual provisions we distingu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the focus of research has been on ensuring franchisee compliance with system procedures, rather than exploring the contract as a means of enabling entrepreneurial activity within the system. Chaudey and Fadairo (2008) found that more constrained franchise contracts improved network performance, due to reduced franchisee opportunism. Contract provisions which provide clear procedures, by which entrepreneurial behaviours on the part of franchisees will be managed within the system, could perhaps enable franchisors to obtain high levels of system compliance without thwarting franchisee entrepreneurial orientation.…”
Section: H2: Franchisor Support Will Be Positively Related To Eo In Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the focus of research has been on ensuring franchisee compliance with system procedures, rather than exploring the contract as a means of enabling entrepreneurial activity within the system. Chaudey and Fadairo (2008) found that more constrained franchise contracts improved network performance, due to reduced franchisee opportunism. Contract provisions which provide clear procedures, by which entrepreneurial behaviours on the part of franchisees will be managed within the system, could perhaps enable franchisors to obtain high levels of system compliance without thwarting franchisee entrepreneurial orientation.…”
Section: H2: Franchisor Support Will Be Positively Related To Eo In Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In franchising, agency theory is also used to model financial returns (Obi, 2005;Brewer, 2003); the proportion of franchising (Alon, 2001;Seshadri, 2002;Pfister et al, 2006;Castrogiovanni et al, 2006b); contractual restraints (Brickley, 1999); franchise compensation (Vázquez, 2005); power and control (Quinn & Doherty, 2000;Pizanti & Lerner, 2003;Dahlstrom et al, 2009); performance (Chaudey & Fadairo, 2008); multi-unit franchising strategies, and internationalization (Sashi & Karuppur, 2002). Agency theory portrays franchising as an organizational form that minimizes the organizational agency costs, especially the monitoring costs.…”
Section: Agency Theoretic Explanations Of International Franchisingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two prominent dimensions of franchising have been extensively studied. The first one is the design of the franchise contract with much of the emphasis on the level of royalty rates and franchised fees (Chaudey and Fadairo, 2008;Lafontaine, 1992;Mathewson and Winter, 1985;Vazquez, 2005;Wimmer and Garren, 1997). The second one analyzes the agency factors likely to affect the trade-off between franchising and company ownership (Brickley, 1999;Brickley and Dark, 1987;Lafontaine, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%