2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2015.01.063
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contamination during the high-energy milling of atomized copper powder and its effects on spark plasma sintering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(44 reference statements)
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In powder H, peak 1 at 187°C is observed in SPS but not in TGA and is probably due to humidity absorbed by the powder [23]. The heat treatment in TGA carried out after the application of vacuum in the TG chamber followed by a flux of argon reduces the formation of humidity, thus eliminating this peak.…”
Section: Spark Plasma Sinteringmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In powder H, peak 1 at 187°C is observed in SPS but not in TGA and is probably due to humidity absorbed by the powder [23]. The heat treatment in TGA carried out after the application of vacuum in the TG chamber followed by a flux of argon reduces the formation of humidity, thus eliminating this peak.…”
Section: Spark Plasma Sinteringmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This is in agreement with the drop in the carbon content of this powder when it is sintered: in sample H, it decreases from 0401 to 0346 wt.%, as reported in Table 8, while it remains almost unvaried in powder L. Peaks 2 and 3 being present in powder H but missing in powder L are explained by considering the different particle sizes of the two powders. Powder H is so fine that an anticipated decomposition of stearic acid is observed, as this lubricant is much finer as well and therefore much more reactive [23].…”
Section: Spark Plasma Sinteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, if the sintering process is carried out improperly, the addition of silicon carbide may decrease impact strength and elongation, and it may significantly reduce wear resistance of sintered materials. The SPS method is a short time consolidation technique (the sintering time is shorter than in the conventional PM process and heating/cooling rates are higher), which also allows for synthesis of various materials (metals, ceramics and composites) [15][16][17][18][19][20]. Moreover, with the use of the SPS it is possible to obtain materials with a porosity below 1% which significantly increases corrosion resistance and mechanical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with conventional sintering methods, the spark plasma sintering (SPS) can save energy and time, improve the equipment efficiency. The material made by SPS have grains with sizes in narrow ranges and excellent mechanical properties [13][14][15][16][17][18] . In our research, we utilized two different routes of SPS to prepare two consolidated copper samples from a gas atomized copper powder with a purity of 99.5% and particle sizes smaller than 75 μm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%