Construção e validação de indicadores de avaliação de práticas de controle e prevenção de infecção do trato urinário associada a cateter

Fernandes, Márcia Vanusa Lima; Lacerda, Rúbia Aparecida; Hallage, Nédia Maria

doi:10.1590/s0103-21002006000200009

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Regarding the consensus judgment on the indicators, the content validation index (CVI) was set as > 75% for agreement among expert opinions (11)(12) .…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Data were collected in October and November 2008 through a questionnaire, comprising the experts' characteristics and their judgment on the indicators (judgment on operating manual, indicator attributes and components), similar to what various authors have used (12) .…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To select the practices, a literature review was used, in the attempt to identify the main care practices developed in the dialysis process, in view of the following criteria: importance of the condition/problem for analysis, high morbidity and mortality risk, high usage volume, high treatment cost, ability to influence the healthcare outcome and, when measured, permitting changes in outcomes and continuous quality improvement. Other criteria are the possibility to construct indicators in the process and outcome components of Donabedian's assessment model and the application of indicators in most HD services (5)(6)9,(11)(12) . (13)(14)(15) .…”

Section: Objectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Indicadores para avaliação do acesso vascular de usuários em hemodiálise

Nicole

Tronchin

2011

Rev. esc. enferm. USP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Portuguese / English: www.scielo.br/reeusp RESUMO Os objetivos deste estudo foram construir indicadores para avaliar a qualidade das práticas assistenciais relacionadas ao acesso vascular de usuários em hemodiálise (HD) e proceder à validação dos indicadores. As etapas para elaborar os indicadores constituíram-se de seleção das práticas assistenciais relacionadas ao acesso vascular, fundamentação teórica dessas práticas e construção de quatro indicadores, segundo o modelo Donabediano: desempenho de cateter temporário duplo lúmen para HD, manutenção de cateter temporário de duplo lúmen, monitoramento de fístula arteriovenosa e complicações de fístula arteriovenosa. A coleta de dados ocorreu entre outubro e novembro de 2008, por meio de um questionário composto pelo julgamento do manual operacional, dos atributos dos indicadores e de seus componentes. A validação foi realizada por nove juízes, e todos os indicadores foram validados sob o consenso mínimo de 75%. Acredita-se que o emprego dessa ferramenta contribua para a avaliação e gestão da qualidade nos serviços de hemodiálise. DESCRITORES

show abstract

“…Regarding the consensus judgment on the indicators, the content validation index (CVI) was set as > 75% for agreement among expert opinions (11)(12) .…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Objectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Indicadores para avaliação do acesso vascular de usuários em hemodiálise

Nicole

Tronchin

2011

Rev. esc. enferm. USP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The participants' response regarding clarity and relevance was used to validate appearance, considering agreement equal to or greater than 75% (22) . Understanding, attractiveness, self-efficacy, cultural acceptability and persuasion were organized in absolute values and percentage, which are presented in a descriptive way and discussed according to literature.…”

Section: Study Protocolmentioning

confidence: 99%

Content validation of an educational booklet for asthma control and management in children

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: to validate the content and appearance of the educational booklet “You can control your child’s asthma - let’s learn together?” with parents and caregivers of children with asthma. Methods: this is a methodological study, carried out with 34 mothers and caregivers of children, from two to 10 years old, diagnosed with asthma. The educational booklet validation was performed using Content Validity Index (CVI) and assessment of comprehension, attractiveness, self-efficacy, persuasion, and cultural acceptance domains. Results: the booklet was considered clear (99.8%) and relevant (100%), with a global CVI of 0.99. Domain assessment proved to be an easy-to-understand tool, culturally appropriate, attractive, with persuasive power and promoting self-efficacy. Conclusion: the booklet is valid and adequate for promoting the self-efficacy of parents and caregivers in childhood asthma control and management, potentially scalable to other realities of outpatient care.

show abstract