2006
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-21002006000200009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Construção e validação de indicadores de avaliação de práticas de controle e prevenção de infecção do trato urinário associada a cateter

Abstract: OBJETIVO: contribuir com uma nova modalidade de avaliação de qualidade de práticas de controle de infecção hospitalar do trato urinário associada a cateterismo. MÉTODOS: estudo de desenvolvimento metodológico, consistindo de elaboração cientificamente fundamentada e validade de conteúdo de três indicadores de avaliação. A validade de conteúdo foi realizada por especialistas e referiu-se ao julgamento dos indicadores em quatro etapas: manual operacional; atributos de conjunto; atributos de componentes; relevânc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the consensus judgment on the indicators, the content validation index (CVI) was set as > 75% for agreement among expert opinions (11)(12) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding the consensus judgment on the indicators, the content validation index (CVI) was set as > 75% for agreement among expert opinions (11)(12) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were collected in October and November 2008 through a questionnaire, comprising the experts' characteristics and their judgment on the indicators (judgment on operating manual, indicator attributes and components), similar to what various authors have used (12) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The participants' response regarding clarity and relevance was used to validate appearance, considering agreement equal to or greater than 75% (22) . Understanding, attractiveness, self-efficacy, cultural acceptability and persuasion were organized in absolute values and percentage, which are presented in a descriptive way and discussed according to literature.…”
Section: Study Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%