Competitive Dynamics of Technological Standardization: The Case of Third Generation Cellular Communications

Glimstedt, Henrik

doi:10.1080/13662710125028

Cited by 10 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…First, we more precisely conceptualize the role of international market regulation, which encompasses issues discussed in an increasing number of discrete sector studies (e.g. Raustiala, 1997;Shaffer, 2000;Glimstedt, 2001;Farrell, 611 Young, 2003;Ansell and Vogel, 2006) but lacks a coherent overall framework to integrate empirical analysis. Second, we lay out conceptual tools that will allow international relations scholars to understand better these relationships and their likely consequences for political-economic phenomena.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Making global markets: Historical institutionalism in international political economy

Farrell

Newman

2010

Review of International Political Economy

125

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Making global markets: Historical institutionalism in international political economy

Farrell

Newman

2010

Review of International Political Economy

125

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Firms which have to pay royalties resent paying them while patent holders eagerly seek royalties while prosecuting firms which refuse to pay. The economic implications of technology standards have raised the political stakes in their development and implementation leading to increasing domestic and international political action to control standards [6][7][8]. With production of goods and services globally fragmented across multiple regions, both within and among companies, the ability of firms to produce inter-platform compatible components and services -as well as devices compatible with standards in foreign markets -is critical.…”

Section: Current Status and Background Of Technology Standardsmentioning

confidence: 99%

National approaches to technology standards for mobile telecommunications

Murphree

Shim

Love

2013

2013 Wireless Telecommunications Symposium (WTS)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The standards' acceptance process is not an easy path to navigate and is littered with successes and failures. Today's mobile communication standards emerged through different processes: some through collaboration between government and business and others from businesses alone. Mobile technology is evolving at a rapid pace and the way in which standards are created is evolving as well. The purpose of this paper is to discuss standardization processes utilizing examples from American, European, Asian models. The background of technology standards will be discussed along with the impacts of different national models. The paper closes with a discussion focusing on the Chinese approach to telecommunication standards and the future of telecommunications standards.

show abstract

“…At the same time, standardization processes tend to be hybrid between de facto and de jure standardization [Glimstedt (2001)]. This often takes the form of private consortia which aim to establish a de facto standard based on common (open) specifications.…”

Section: Trends In Standardization Processesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Contextual and Tactical Changes in Standards Wars: What Consequences for "Winners"?

Varé

Seifert

2008

Int. J. Innovation Technol. Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the last decades, battles for technological dominance between competing technologies have had a significant impact on many industries. In this paper, we investigate how the fast-moving technology environment influences the tactical choices of companies trying to establish their products as de facto standards. We analyze contextual changes in the evolution of standards wars using a literature survey supported by three integrated case studies. We develop the portfolio of tactics that competing companies should apply in the management of emerging standards wars, composed both of traditional and new deployment tactics. We demonstrate that contextual and tactical changes heighten the pressures on timing and the competition exposure in today's standards competitions. As a consequence, it becomes more difficult for an alleged "winner" to "take all" in the marketplace. A = abandonment, C = conversion, D = de jure standardization, G = technologies are obsolete and replaced by a new product generation, W = clear winner. * * a.o. = among others. Int. J. Innovation Technol. Management 2008.05:447-474. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com by UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO on 02/03/15. For personal use only.

show abstract

Competitive Dynamics of Technological Standardization: The Case of Third Generation Cellular Communications

Cited by 10 publications

References 0 publications

Making global markets: Historical institutionalism in international political economy

Making global markets: Historical institutionalism in international political economy

National approaches to technology standards for mobile telecommunications

Contextual and Tactical Changes in Standards Wars: What Consequences for "Winners"?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About