With the understanding that innovation and high technology industries are essential for sustained economic development, government R&D subsidies have become ubiquitous. However, existing studies on the impact of R&D subsidies have found mixed or conflicting results. Insights from resource dependence theory (RDT) and the Attention‐Based View (ABV) help account for these discrepancies. This study of Chinese high technology firms using the Innovation‐Oriented Firms Database from the Ministry of Science and Technology, finds an inverted U‐shaped relationship between R&D subsidies and innovation performance. The article shows that high government resource dependency, expressed through high percentage of R&D spending coming from government subsidies, diverts attention resources in recipient firms and results in declining innovation performance. The article then tests the impacts of different managerial responses on the dependency‐innovation relationship and find that technology alliances and employee feedback systems mitigate these negative effects. These findings have implications for government innovation policies and firm‐level responses to those policies: government subsidy policies have limits to their effectiveness and firms have strategic options for capitalizing on government resources without sacrificing innovativeness.
This paper explains why many small and medium-sized (SME) private hightechnology Chinese manufacturing firms survive and thrive within an institutional and political system arrayed against them. We use the mobile phone handset industry as an illustrative case of the vitality and capabilities of Chinese SMEs. We argue that in capitalizing on the advantages offered by the global fragmentation of production, while also being constrained by an institutional climate of structured uncertainty, Chinese non-state firms have chosen a pattern of incremental innovation in their search for competitive advantage. Despite falling outside central government innovation plans and engaging in practices inimical to nurturing novel product innovation capabilities, these firms have a sustainable business model based on niche tailoring, rapid product introduction and utilization of standardized components.
Research SummaryHow do multinational enterprises (MNEs) address host‐country challenges after the initial investment? And when does foreign direct investment (FDI) result in local upgrading? Using a study of FDI and global value chain participation in Dongguan, China, we find a mechanism in which FDI results in sustained local economic upgrading and improved MNE subsidiary performance: a collaborative public space (CPS). A CPS is a social space based on trust that enables different and divided actors to engage, sharing concerns and information in ways that they otherwise would be disinclined to consider. Using the CPS concept, we expand understanding of the effectiveness of MNE strategies in host‐country environments and the conditions in which FDI leads to change in global value chains.Managerial SummaryThe international strategy literature has found that FDI has ambiguous impacts on host‐country regions and firms, leading in some cases to upgrading or in others to local firm deskilling or decline. It has also shown that the postinvestment strategies of MNEs, particularly political connections or business associations, have mixed results. Using the concept of a CPS, we show how the construction of a trust‐based social space can improve MNE subsidiary and local firm performance and lead to changes in the structure and composition of global value chains (GVC). The GVC changes by incorporating new host‐country suppliers and buyers as well as increasing the value‐added, thus creating a new node and exchange patterns in the GVC.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.