Comparison of the bleaching efficacy of three different agents used for intracoronal bleaching of discolored primary teeth: An in vitro study

Abstract

The bleaching efficacy of 10% hydrogen peroxide gel was more effective than 10% carbamide peroxide and sodium perborate in bleaching the artificially discolored primary teeth.

Comparison of Nd:YAG and Diode Laser Irradiation During Intracoronal Bleaching with Sodium Perborate: Color and Raman Spectroscopy Analysis

“…2 The previous studies showed that sodium perborate was able to bleach nonvital teeth. [17][18][19] All groups in the present study included sodium perborate in order to compare the efficacy of two laser systems. Ganesh et al used a control group in which bleaching was done with distilled water, and reported no significant changes after 14 days.…”

“…Ganesh et al used a control group in which bleaching was done with distilled water, and reported no significant changes after 14 days. 19 The no laser group was accepted as the control group in the present study.…”

Potential Advantages of Peroxoborates and Their Ester Adducts Over Hydrogen Peroxide as Therapeutic Agents in Oral Healthcare Products: Chemical/Biochemical Reactivity Considerations In Vitro, Ex Vivo And In Vivo

“…However, one additional in vitro study [ 115 ] was focused on an exploration of the tooth-bleaching efficacies of a 10% ( w/w ) H 2 O 2 gel, 10% ( w/w ) CP and a 2.0 g quantity of peroxoborate towards human primary maxillary central incisors which were discolored with freshly collected human blood. From the results acquired, it was concluded that all the bleaching agents applied were effective at 7- and 14-day post-treatment time-points ( p = 0.013), and that the 10% ( w/w ) H 2 O 2 gel treatment exerted a greater tooth-whitening activity than those of the 10% ( w/w ) CP and peroxoborate formulations applied.…”

Comparación Espectrofotométrica de las Sesiones de Blanqueamiento Intracameral con Peróxido de Hidrógeno y Carbamida a Diferentes Concentraciones

“…Estos parámetros resultaron en un tamaño mínimo muestral de 11 unidades por grupo incluyendo una proporción de pérdida del 10 %. Este es consistente con el tamaño muestral grupal observado en otros trabajos clínicos de blanqueamiento con metodología similar; Lim et al (2004), que utilizaron un n=11, y Ganesh et al (2013), que utilizó un n=10. Debido a una exitosa recolección de dientes, se utilizó finalmente un n=22 para cada grupo de estudio.…”