2010
DOI: 10.5152/jtgga.2010.24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of standard mammography with digital mammography and digital infrared thermal imaging for breast cancer screening

Abstract: Comparison of standard mammography with digital mammography and digital infrared thermal imaging for breast cancer screening Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women. Screenfilm mammography (SFM) has been considered the gold standard for breast cancer screening and detection. Despite its recognized value in detecting and characterizing breast disease, mammography has important limitations and its false-negative rate ranges from 4% to 34%. Given these limitations, development of imaging modalities t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…IR thermography-also known as thermal imaging-is a non-contact and noninvasive imaging approach that has been exploited for a wide range of biomedical and non-biomedical applications. It has been studied for use in cancer imaging [1][2][3][4][5][6][7], ischemic monitoring and vascular disease [8,9], wound assessment [10], corneal temperature measurement [11][12][13], diagnosis of rheumatologic diseases [14], fever screening [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] been encountered in clinical translation of IR thermography. Standardization in different aspects of medical thermography, including tools (both acquisition hardware and processing algorithm) and examination environment, has always been a general agreement among the community of medical thermography [27].…”
Section: Infrared (Ir) Thermography Medical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IR thermography-also known as thermal imaging-is a non-contact and noninvasive imaging approach that has been exploited for a wide range of biomedical and non-biomedical applications. It has been studied for use in cancer imaging [1][2][3][4][5][6][7], ischemic monitoring and vascular disease [8,9], wound assessment [10], corneal temperature measurement [11][12][13], diagnosis of rheumatologic diseases [14], fever screening [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] been encountered in clinical translation of IR thermography. Standardization in different aspects of medical thermography, including tools (both acquisition hardware and processing algorithm) and examination environment, has always been a general agreement among the community of medical thermography [27].…”
Section: Infrared (Ir) Thermography Medical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several applications of IRT in medical science has been highlighted by Jung et al [24] and Ammer and Ring [25]. IRT has been extensively used for diabetic neuropathy [16,[26][27][28][29][30][31], vascular disorder [6,32,33], breast cancer detection [34][35][36][37][38][39][40], thermoregulation study [4,5], fever screening [41][42][43][44], brain imaging (thermoencephaloscopy) [45], dentistry and dermatology [46][47][48], muscular pain and shoulder impingement syndrome study [49], diagnosis of rheumatologic diseases [50][51][52], dry eye syndrome diagnosis [53], treatment of parasitic liver diseases [54], detection of metastatic liver disease [55], bowel ischemia [56], renal transplantation [57,58], heart treatment [59], and gynecology [60][61][62]. IRT has been used in acupuncture treatment [63][64]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there are still mixed opinions on the usefulness of thermography as a screening or diagnostic tool for breast cancer, with certain authors in favor of the modality (Köşüş et al, 2010[21]), while others argue against it (Vreugdenburg et al, 2013[38]). This is mostly due to the inconsistent specificity and sensitivity values observed by various authors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%