1983
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.18.4.950-955.1983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of stained smears and culturing for identification of Treponema hyodysenteriae

Abstract: A comparative study was made of stained fecal smears and cultured fecal swabs for identification of the large spirochetes Treponema hyodysenteriae and Treponema innocens. Feces were obtained by swabbing rectums, colons, and stools of nonexposed swine and swine experimentally exposed to swine dysentery. In this study there was a significant (P < 0.001) correlation between the observation of one or more large spirochetes on stained slides and obtaining either a strong or a weak beta-hemolytic reaction in culture… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spirochetes isolated on sliced blood agar from the two samples of swine not exposed to SD but having a soft stool (source 11; Table 1) migrated similarly to that of S. hyodysenteriae but produced a weak beta-hemolysis similar to that of S. innocens (2,5). However, only 1 of the 2 samples produced weak beta-hemolysis with conventional streaking.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The spirochetes isolated on sliced blood agar from the two samples of swine not exposed to SD but having a soft stool (source 11; Table 1) migrated similarly to that of S. hyodysenteriae but produced a weak beta-hemolysis similar to that of S. innocens (2,5). However, only 1 of the 2 samples produced weak beta-hemolysis with conventional streaking.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 151 rectal and colonic swab samples were collected and tested for S. hyodysenteriae from swine experimentally or farm exposed to SD, swine with soft stools, and nondiarrhetic swine not exposed to SD (Table 1). With each rectal or colonic sample, 3 swabs were collected: one swab for the count of large spirochetes per oil immersion field (OIF), one swab for streaking the sliced agar, and one swab for conventional streaking (5). From swine with acute SD diarrhea, 20 rectal samples were collected from 20 live swine, 16 colonic samples from 16 dead swine, 2 rectal samples of 2 swine from 2 farm outbreaks, and 20 colonic samples from 2 frozen colons.…”
Section: Source Of Swine For Swabsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations