1993
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1135(93)90182-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification and partial characterization of a group of weakly β-hemolytic intestinal spirochetes of swine distinct from Serpulina innocens isolate B256

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…WBHIS of cluster IV (P43-like strains) have previously been reported to differ both genetically and phenotypically from Serpulina strains belonging to other clusters and subclusters (7,9,10,19,30,32,49,57). Our results strongly support a significant difference between P43-like strains and serpulinas within the other phylogenetic clusters.…”
Section: Except For Cluster III Which Is Represented By S Innocens supporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…WBHIS of cluster IV (P43-like strains) have previously been reported to differ both genetically and phenotypically from Serpulina strains belonging to other clusters and subclusters (7,9,10,19,30,32,49,57). Our results strongly support a significant difference between P43-like strains and serpulinas within the other phylogenetic clusters.…”
Section: Except For Cluster III Which Is Represented By S Innocens supporting
confidence: 83%
“…strains (32) and "Serpulina murdochii" has been proposed for weakly beta-hemolytic strains without ␣-galactosidase activity (30). WBHIS that cause intestinal spirochetosis have been found to differ from other serpulinas both genetically and phenetically (7,9,10,19,30,32,49,57). The reference strain for these spirochetes is Serpulina strain P43/6/78 (57).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chromosomal DNA of the spirochetes was isolated using a previously described method. 28 An S. pilosicoli-specific 16S rRNA gene sequence was amplified using a modification 24 of a previously described method. 26 A 21-base forward primer extending from base position 65 of S. pilosicoli isolate P43/6/78 16S rRNA gene b (5Ј-AGAGGAAAGTTTTTTCGCTTC-3Ј) and a 20-base Serpulina spp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,13,31 However, an association between a WBHIS, recently classified as S. pilosicoli, and a nonfatal diarrheal disease of growing pigs, called porcine intestinal spirochetosis or porcine colonic spirochetosis (PCS), has been recognized. 1,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]19,[24][25][26][27][28][32][33][34][35][36][37] With more intensive swine production, where the efficiency of weight gain is closely monitored, PCS has been recognized as a major contributing factor to reduced performance in growing and finishing pigs. 5,6,8,9,10,12,34 Koch's postulates for S. pilosicoli have been fulfilled using gnotobiotic pigs 25 and conventional pigs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work undertaken in the early to mid-1990s, using mainly multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (20)(21)(22)(23) but also DNA-DNA hybridization, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and biochemical testing (24)(25)(26), demonstrated that spirochetes resembling P43/6/78 that had been isolated from pigs, human beings, and poultry all belonged to a distinct new species of intestinal spirochete that is now known as B. pilosicoli (27). At that time this species was referred to as "Anguillina coli" (21,22) or "group IV weakly hemolytic intestinal spirochetes" (25), before being officially named Serpulina pilosicoli (28).…”
Section: History and Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%