2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2016.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of phytoremediation, bioaugmentation and natural attenuation for remediating saline soil contaminated by heavy crude oil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Economical, efficient and environment‐friendly bioremediation has been widely applied to deal with PH contamination . Bioremediation methods for PH, including phytoremediation and microbial remediation technology, have shown great research and application value . In particular, microbial remediation technology has exhibited high restoration efficiency in the remediation of PH pollution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Economical, efficient and environment‐friendly bioremediation has been widely applied to deal with PH contamination . Bioremediation methods for PH, including phytoremediation and microbial remediation technology, have shown great research and application value . In particular, microbial remediation technology has exhibited high restoration efficiency in the remediation of PH pollution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Bioremediation methods for PH, including phytoremediation and microbial remediation technology, have shown great research and application value. 11 In particular, microbial remediation technology has exhibited high restoration efficiency in the remediation of PH pollution. During the microbial remediation process, PH components are absorbed, degraded and transformed in the contaminated system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further investigation revealed that fluctuating water contents increased anthracene availability, contributing to increased removal [15]. It can be speculated that the large salt content in soil with EC 146 dS m -1 dispersed the soil particles in such a way that the PAHs were not physically protected and became available for degradation [36]. Consequently, the removal of PAHs was not inhibited by salts in soil with EC 146 dS m ), which renders it only slowly available for microbial degradation [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Björklöf et al 2008, Kristensen et al 2015 or include all fractions (total petroleum hydrocarbons) (e.g. Cai et al 2016, Yu et al 2011. The biodegradation rate can be calculated by accounting for the duration of the experiment and the concentration of petroleum hydrocarbons in the environmental compartment in question.…”
Section: Commonly Used Methods For Chemical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%