2009
DOI: 10.1177/112067210901900607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of IOP measurement by ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour, Goldmann applanation, and noncontact tonometry

Abstract: IOP readings detected by DCT and IOP-ORAcc were not found to be clinically interchangeable with GAT and NCT readings. IOP-ORAcc and DCT readings may be regarded as comparable and independent of CCT, in the range of the normal IOP.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…33,41,43,49,50 The stronger the corneal tension, the faster the cornea regains its original position following deformation. Therefore, IOP represents an additional force that restores the cornea to its original position (like a slingshot).…”
Section: Impact Of Corneal Thickness and Iop On Ch And Crfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33,41,43,49,50 The stronger the corneal tension, the faster the cornea regains its original position following deformation. Therefore, IOP represents an additional force that restores the cornea to its original position (like a slingshot).…”
Section: Impact Of Corneal Thickness and Iop On Ch And Crfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No studies met all of the specified criteria. Agreement between ocular response analyser and Goldmann applanation tonometer Twelve studies 110,111,129,130,135,136,142,174,183,184,212,214 provide sufficient data to include in the metaanalysis. The full results of the agreement analyses of ORA and GAT are given in Appendix 4.…”
Section: Ocular Response Analyser Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…217 One additional study was reported as a multicentre study, taking place in Italy and Spain. 218 After contacting authors to clarify the age of study participants, eight authors from nine studies 135,140,141,148,189,190,192,201,212 confirmed eligibility for inclusion. One study included only participants who were aged ≥ 50 years but did not give the age range.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…18 Öncel ve ark.nın çalış-masında, 60 sağlıklı bireyin nonkontakt tonometre, ORA, PDKT ve GAT ile GİB ölçümleri alınmış ve PDKT ile ORA ölçümlerinin SKK'den daha az etkilendiği belirtilmiştir. 19 Çalışmamızdan elde edilen GİB verilerinin analizi sonucunda özellikle ince korneası olan hastalarda Tono-Pen, PDKT veya Icare tonometresi ile yapılan ölçümlerin daha doğru GİB ölçüm sonucu verdiği gözlemlenmiştir.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified