1986
DOI: 10.2307/1163055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Computer-Assisted Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
130
0
13

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
130
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…First, motivational studies of cooperative classrooms strongly suggest that cultural similarity per se may be less important than the culture-general adaptive value of cooperative learning. Across cultures, classroom arrangements facilitating cooperative learning are more effective in supporting motivation and achievement than individual or competitive goals structures (Ames and Archer, 1988;Gallimore, 1981;Johnson and Johnson, 1985). For example, Phalet and Lens (1995) found the highest levels of psychological adjustment and task performance among Turkish and Belgian students who were most strongly committed to both task goals and group goals.…”
Section: Cultural Difference: Discontinuity Between Family and Schoolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, motivational studies of cooperative classrooms strongly suggest that cultural similarity per se may be less important than the culture-general adaptive value of cooperative learning. Across cultures, classroom arrangements facilitating cooperative learning are more effective in supporting motivation and achievement than individual or competitive goals structures (Ames and Archer, 1988;Gallimore, 1981;Johnson and Johnson, 1985). For example, Phalet and Lens (1995) found the highest levels of psychological adjustment and task performance among Turkish and Belgian students who were most strongly committed to both task goals and group goals.…”
Section: Cultural Difference: Discontinuity Between Family and Schoolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the students in the experimental group had the opportunity to organise and initiate their individual and group learning activity. This in turn contributed to their higher achievement which Garcia and Pearson (1994) and Johnson and Johnson (1978) see as the main goal of alternative assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The retained learning is dependent of the frequency of the learning, and temporal delay between each review or application of the learning [13], this proposed method will potentially identify if any learning is evident from both single and multiple exposures to a learning concept within a single session. When combined with structured observation, it is possible that the triangulation of these three methods will provide qualitative and quantitative data on learning.…”
Section: A Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%