2020
DOI: 10.2298/sarh181121065j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparative analysis of measuring the body fat percentage by anthropometric methods and bioimpedance

Abstract: Introduction/Objective. Body fat percentage (BFP) is the most reliable indicator of a nutritional status. For clinical practice it is important but scarcely investigated whether to exclusively use contemporary methods of BFP measurement, or classic anthropometric methods are also reliable. The aim was to investigate the correlation between the results of BFP measuring using a contemporary method of bioimpedance (Bio) and classic methods of skin fold thickness (SFT) and body mass index (BMI). … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Respondents, aged 20-40 years, with BMI < 25 kg/m 2 , joined the birth preparation program from the 20th to the 32nd week of gestation. BMI before pregnancy was determined by dividing body weight in kilograms by squared body height in meters (kg/m 2 ) [16]. Respondents who agreed to participate in the research voluntarily signed an informed consent form.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respondents, aged 20-40 years, with BMI < 25 kg/m 2 , joined the birth preparation program from the 20th to the 32nd week of gestation. BMI before pregnancy was determined by dividing body weight in kilograms by squared body height in meters (kg/m 2 ) [16]. Respondents who agreed to participate in the research voluntarily signed an informed consent form.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%