2005
DOI: 10.1016/s0368-2315(05)82672-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparaison de l’efficacité entre dispositif intravaginal et gel vaginal de dinoprostone dans la maturation cervicale à terme en pratique quotidienne

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lack of consensus likely depends on the heterogeneous characteristics of the control group in terms of parity, gestational age, pre-induction Bishop score, substance and dosage used. In earlier studies, the pessary has been indifferently compared with vaginal or intracervical gel containing prostaglandin E 2 , and with misoprostol, a strong analog which has multiple indications [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]; more recently equal effectiveness has been reported for both procedures [18,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lack of consensus likely depends on the heterogeneous characteristics of the control group in terms of parity, gestational age, pre-induction Bishop score, substance and dosage used. In earlier studies, the pessary has been indifferently compared with vaginal or intracervical gel containing prostaglandin E 2 , and with misoprostol, a strong analog which has multiple indications [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]; more recently equal effectiveness has been reported for both procedures [18,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%